Close followers of the Syrian struggle against the Baathist dictatorship 
have probably grown accustomed to the “false flag” arguments of its 
apologists who see every regime massacre as an incident staged by the 
CIA et al to undermine the regime with the most prominent case being the 
sarin gas attack on East Ghouta in August 2013.

In the latest go-round, Rick Sterling of the misnamed Syria Solidarity 
Coalition has written a 30 page dossier titled The Caesar Photo Fraud 
that Undermined Syrian Negotiations that begins by referring to past 
“false flag” conspiracies with this at the top of the list:

        In Gulf War 1, there were reports of Iraqi troops stealing incubators 
from Kuwait, leaving babies to die on the cold floor. Amnesty 
International incorrectly “verified” the false accusations.

As is so often the case with the Baathist amen corner, there is very 
little introspection. If this was such a blatant lie (and it was), why 
did the father of the current dynast in Damascus hook up with the USA, 
Saudi Arabia and other demonic powers against Iraq? Putting 7,500 troops 
at the disposal of the imperialist invasion force, Hafez al-Assad 
calculated that it would put him on the side of the winners. He was 
correct. After standing up for the feudal lords of Kuwait, he was 
rewarded with renewed diplomatic relations with Britain and an easing of 
tensions with the USA that clearly recognized the importance of having 
an “anti-imperialist” government on its side as the NY Times reported on 
September 15, 1999:

        The main purpose of Mr. Baker’s visit, American officials insisted, was 
symbolic. By meeting with President Assad, Mr. Baker sought to draw 
attention, particularly in the Arab world, to the fact that one of the 
most hard-line Arab nationalist regimes is joining the American-led 
multinational coalition against Iraq.

        Syria’s participation legitimizes that coalition in Arab eyes in a way 
that no other country could, American officials say. The Administration 
has been worried from the start that President Saddam Hussein would 
break out of the boycott by convincing the Arab public that he is really 
fighting the Americans and just a few Arab ”lackeys.”

So in a war that really set the tone for the next invasion of Iraq in 
2002, Bashar’s daddy was indispensable for selling the war to the Arab 
world, arguably with much more force than the stealing incubators 
bullshit. You might say that in this instance the true flag was a lot 
more damaging than the false flag.

full: 
https://louisproyect.org/2016/03/04/a-response-to-rick-sterlings-claim-that-torture-did-not-take-place-in-syria/
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to