(This just appeared on Marxmail.)

Dear Friends,

We have been following the debates on your list re the US elections and
especially what stance to take towards the Nader and Camejo campaign.
Not having a preferential voting-style electoral system does pose a
major dilemma for the left in the US and Britain. In countries such as
Australia, while the debates over lesser-evilism continue, the partial
preferential voting system makes it somewhat easier on left alternatives
to put their case in the electoral arena.

We agree with putting the stress on the strategic questions here: the
need to build a strong mass movement and a left alternative to the
two-party system. This, also includes electoral tactics, especially
because of the level of illusions in the parliamentary system. A left
alternative needs to have an electoral expression as well.

Unfortunately some of the arguments of those progressives calling for a
vote for Kerry could lead to the conclusion that the left does not
participate as an independent force in electoral politics, period,
because there is always a danger that it will aid the Republicans (or
the Conservatives).

This is the danger in confining your framework to the lesser-evil in
electoral politics.

And, of course, that Kerry is a lesser-evil is even questionable from
the point-of-view of the war in Iraq, a decisive question in world
politics, and the economic policies of the US ruling class, especially
in relation to the third world.

Kerry's pro-war line is clearly exposed to the international movement.
Here in the Philippines movement everyone acknowledges there is no
difference between the Bush and Kerry policies. In fact after the
release of the latest al Qaida video Kerry's line has been so chillingly
pro-war: "They are barbarians. I will stop at absolutely nothing to hunt
down, capture or kill the terrorists wherever they are, whatever it
takes." (Philippines Daily Inquirer)

These statements aren't "abstract" to us either. This is not just
against bin Laden. This is against so-called "terrorist" movements and
peoples of the Third World, such as the movement here in the Philippines.

If I was voting in the US I would vote for Nader and Camejo (I think
Camejo's statements have been excellent) and simultaneously campaign for
a big anti-war action when the next president is inaugurated.
The Nader/Camejo campaign too needs to think about life after the
elections and its role in building a militant mass movement because
that's where its future lies: in the mass movement and not electoral
politics.

Reihana & Sonny
Philippines

--
Marxism list: www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to