This report came from a friend of mine in Germany, Lueko Willms.  Iraqis
are not only being threatened by some resistance groups if they vote.
They are being threatened by US troops if they don't:


>From Lueko:
   A CNN reporter accompanied a US occupation squad -- they were
breaking open doors with a heavy ram, pointed with their arms on the
people living in the house, and then had an Iraqi military person with
them, covered under a hood, distributing leaflets for the elections.

   Sort of an "armed propaganda".





washingtonpost.com
U.S. Troops' Role in Iraqi Elections Criticized
U.N. Official Assails Distribution of Material
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 27, 2005; Page A14


UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 26 -- The United Nations' top elections official,
Carina Perelli, sharply criticized U.S. military forces in Iraq
Wednesday for distributing material urging Iraqis to vote in the
country's elections Sunday.

Perelli and other U.N. officials are concerned that such U.S. military
involvement is compromising efforts to convince the Iraqi public that
Iraqis are directing the elections.

Perelli said she and the top U.N. election official in Iraq, Carlos
Valenzuela, have been "asking, begging military commanders" to stop the
distribution of material promoting the elections. Officials from the
U.N.-backed Iraqi Electoral Commission have also asked the United States
to stop, she said.

"The U.S. military have been extremely, I would say, overenthusiastic in
trying to help out with this election," she told reporters. "And we have
been basically saying that they should try to minimize their
participation, because this is an Iraqi process."

Informed by a reporter that U.S. soldiers have distributed voting
material in recent weeks, Perelli said: "I'm glad that you reported it,
because I'm going to be screaming on the phone in two minutes."

A significant voter turnout in Iraq's elections would help bolster the
Bush administration's case that the political transition there enjoys
widespread public support.

On Wednesday, President Bush urged Iraqis to "defy these terrorists"
seeking to intimidate voters and go to the polls.

He predicted that "millions of Iraqi voters will show their bravery,
their love of country and their desire to live in freedom" by casting
votes.

Asked to respond to Perelli's comments, Gen. John Abizaid, the commander
of U.S. forces in Iraq, said: "We understand that this is an Iraqi
election" and "American soldiers do not have the mission to get the vote
out."

But a Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Barry Venable, said: "It is my
understanding that U.S. soldiers and other coalition forces patrolling
in various places there have been handing out, if you will, some
elections education material" produced by the Iraqi Electoral
Commission.

Perelli's remarks came at a U.N. news briefing on preparations for the
elections. "From a technical point of view, these elections are as sound
as they can be under the circumstances," she said.

But it is up to Iraqis to "confront their fears and confront their
hopes" and decide whether the election "is important enough, is valid
enough, is legitimate enough in order to risk their lives to go and
vote," she said.

Kieran Prendergast, the U.N. undersecretary general for political
affairs, said that the conditions for the elections "are far from
ideal," but that "imperfect elections are the right instrument of policy
for a democratic transition in Iraq."

Prendergast said that many Iraqis still feel "excluded and alienated" by
the country's political transition, and that others question the
impartiality of the Iraqi Electoral Commission. Still, he said that the
new government will have fresh opportunities after the elections to
"co-opt sectors of the population" that oppose the political transition.
He cited the upcoming drafting of a new Iraqi constitution, the
constitutional referendum in October and another general election in
December.

Sunday's elections "shouldn't be seen as the be-all and end-all event,"
he said. "Fortunately, there will be other opportunities in 2005 to
achieve greater inclusion."

Reply via email to