-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael
perelman


I think that it would be interesting to compile a list of people who
have come under fire recently.  I just heard an interview with Wiener
and Gerald Markowitz, who is coming under fire for being right.

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050207&s=wiener

"The reasons for the companies' actions are not hard to find: They face
potentially massive liability claims on the order of the tobacco litigation
if cancer is linked to vinyl chloride-based consumer products such as
hairspray. The stakes are high also for publishers of controversial books,
and for historians who write them, because when authors are charged with
ethical violations and manuscript readers are subpoenaed, that has a
chilling effect. The stakes are highest for the public, because this dispute
centers on access to information about cancer-causing chemicals in consumer
products."


------------------------------------

[perhaps not any more............]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14597-2005Feb10.html
Class-Action Bill Near Enactment
House Action, Bush Signature Set to Follow Senate Passage

By John F. Harris
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 11, 2005; Page A04

Major legislation revising the rules by which class-action lawsuits are
waged will be headed as early as next week to the White House for President
Bush's signature, as easy Senate passage yesterday gave Bush and business
groups a long-sought victory they asserted will result in fewer meritless
cases clogging the courts.

The Senate passed the bill 72 to 26, as many Democrats joined most
Republicans in passing the measure, which will funnel class-action suits
with plaintiffs from multiple states out of state courts and into the
federal system. Proponents say the change will lead to more rational and
more consistent rulings. Consumer groups fighting the bill warned that, in
practice, many valid claims will never be heard, because federal judges
often dismiss class-action cases on procedural grounds.

The easy Senate passage had been forecast earlier in the week, when
amendments that opponents of the Class Action Fairness Act said would make
the measure less objectionable did not pass. The Republican leadership in
the House -- where similar measures have passed several times in recent
years -- had already announced that it would push the bill to passage if the
Senate passed a "clean" bill unburdened by amendments.

"We look forward to this legislation coming to the House floor next week so
we can send it to President Bush," House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.)
and other backers said in a statement after the Senate vote.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said the passage indicated that
bipartisanship is still possible in the Senate, despite several years in
which partisan warfare has thrived and relationships across the aisle have
frayed. He specifically praised his Democratic counterpart, Minority Leader
Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who opposed the measure, for not using procedural
tactics that might have stalled the measure even with majority support. The
comment was by implication a shot at what Republicans regarded as the
revanchist tactics of former Senate minority leader Thomas A. Daschle
(D-S.D.), who lost his reelection bid last fall.

"Harry and I had a commitment to work together," Frist said.

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said he hopes the class-action measure "is an
example -- I hope it is a template" for more cooperation in the future.

But Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) said it would be wrong to read too
much into the class-action development, which he described as a simple
procedural remedy whose time had come.

Another Democrat, Sen. Herb Kohl (Wis.), said the measure will take aim at
"forum-shopping," in which lawyers file cases in localities where judges and
courts are known to be sympathetic to plaintiffs, regardless of whether
there is any logic to hearing the case there. "Every bill with merit will
still go forward," he said.

Opponents, including many state attorneys general and consumer groups,
vigorously dispute this point. The amendments rejected by the Senate earlier
in the week were aimed at ensuring that federal judges accept the cases,
rather than dismiss them on the grounds that in national class-action cases
there can be confusion about how to apply diverse state regulatory laws. The
failure of the amendments, said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), showed that "the
fix is in" and that the Senate has been "reduced to taking its marching
orders on major legislation from corporate special interests and . . .
allies in the White House."

Joan Claybrook, head of the consumer group Public Citizen, warned that
yesterday's action "has given banks, credit card companies, insurers, HMOs,
drug manufacturers and other big corporations a green light to defraud and
deceive consumers without fear of being held accountable."

Reply via email to