Nordhaus
<http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/prod_092402.pdf> and
Gordon
<http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/gordon/Productivity-Brookings.pdf>
see several tech-using industries as major contributors to the
productivity acceleration, notably retail (i.e., Wal-Mart) and
finance (web trading). Those sectors are exempt from the critique of
hedonic pricing.

Doug

Devine, James wrote:

 > The economy's performance in the second half of the decade [the
1990s] was considerably better, but much of the acceleration in
growth was simply due to increased depreciation-the output needed to
replace worn out or obsolete equipment and software. Net domestic
product (NDP)-the Commerce Department's measure of usable
output-grew at a rate that was nearly half a percentage point less
than the growth rate of GDP in the second half of the decade. In the
boom years of the late nineties, NDP grew only slightly faster than
it did in the seventies, and far below the rates of the fifties and
sixties. <

from http://www.cepr.net/stock_market/new_economy_goes_bust.htm

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine

________________________________

From: PEN-L list on behalf of Daniel Davies
Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 10:24 PM
To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] article on oil & dollars



Jim do you have a reference for where Dean says this?  It looks like a very
important point, since one of the big things that happened around that time
was the introduction of hedonic adjustment in the computer industry, and
since it's always seemed to me that the flipside of what they were doing
with hedonic adjustment of the price of new computers would have to be a
reduction of the effective useful life of a computer.

best
dd

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Devine,
James
Sent: 28 February 2005 04:29
To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Subject: Re: article on oil & dollars


Dean Baker argues that US productivity growth has been exaggerated, since depreciation also sped up. If you adjust for the latter, US productivity growth doesn't look as good.

Reply via email to