i do not see it as the equivalent of matrix, where a virtual reality is created and maintained. but if you are a materialist, a human is no different from a computer. we may have been programmed by nature while computers may need programming by us. nonetheless, if a finite mass (the human population) can exhibit certain traits, why not some other finite mass?
--ravi ^^^^^ CB: As I said, I can't think of an abstract principle excluding the possibility you pose. To me , the Matrix movie is kind of ambiguous on the issue of whether the _computers_ have attained society and social being, reproductive, regenerative self-perpetuative purposes. I suppose one of those characters could be a sort of Wizard of Oz human running all the computer stuff from behind the scenes. I really couldn't follow all that was supposed to be happening. But I just grabbed at it for its currency in this discussion. I guess the issue of biologicality , computers somehow duplicating biological evolution , enters in.