I am not sticking to the old versions of leadership. Recently I asked a histroian who has been working on Cuba what prospects exist for deepening the socialist project and she sadi it will most likely go when Castro goes... It is this that should be averted
I agree
"michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 03:33 20/01/2006, Soula wrote:
>Missing: The working class mythologizes the struggle into a
>Manichean good and evil situation. Only a few will bother to look
>into the books of corporations to see how things are working.
>the vanguard therefore should have a leading space to create and
>chart the course of the struggle, else it will be one working class
>mistake after another and a confusion of strategy and tactic.
Soula, nothing I am saying challenges the concept of leadership, but
don't you think a redefinition of leadership is called for (one that
goes well beyond 'the correct decisions of an infallible central committee')?
>
>Anti economism in Marxism dates far back and maybe Michael's is a
>revulsion and revision of some Trotskyite positions that he has seen
>along the way.
I would not limit this to Trotskyist positions. Yes,
anti-economism dates far back, but the question is whether its basis
is sufficiently rooted in the understanding of Marx's conception (as
opposed to political eclecticism).
in solidarity,
m
Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1
Caracas, Venezuela
(58-212) 573-4111
fax: (58-212) 573-7724
Yahoo! Photos
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.
