*       From: Doyle


CB,
I would just like to see more effective radical or even reformist propaganda
coming from the postmodern projects.

Doyle,
One can see in their relativistic analysis, how realistic materialistic,
mental conflicts, might arise in a text, but not have a clue of where to go
with that or how to bring up important elements of the structure that matter
in developing practical action.

^^^
CB: Exactly.

DS:There is a material basis for seeing variable points of view that was
obvious for centuries as Autopletic brings up and is not tethered to text.
We have some idea that the relativistic cognitive structure is a six layered
sheet of neurons. We have plenty of evidence in vision theory how that
relativism appears, for example the Land-Mondrian experiments.

^^^^
CB: Would you elaborate some ?

^^^^

DS: The critical Post Modernist error is the understanding of text as a
product of human cognition, but not grounding that in the human body. Their
narrow focus upon text to see relativism also reflects their aversion to
'reductionism'.

CB,
In other words, with their insights into superstructure, that it consists of
structure, grand
narratives/"stories", and metaphors, analogies, isomorphisms, ambiguities,
puns, double and triple entendres should not only be fun, but a basis for
influencing the way masses think so that they will change the world.

Doyle,
Charles wants to see some action come out of the paralysis or stagnation
that over took Post Modernism. The reason the method theory evaporated was
their metaphysics not grounded in the body prevents them from acting on
relativism.

Text is linear and cognition is non-linear. To question text when one knows
cognition is non-linear seems central to me.

^^^
CB: Yes. "Linear" and "non-linear" are well used terms, but here what is an
elaborated or more specified statement of what you mean by "non-linear" ?

^^^^^^

 Since that long known physical fact can't be addressed by grand narrative
theory for reasons of being outside the boundaries of legitimate Post Modern
inquiry, you just hit the brick wall.
thanks,
Doyle

Reply via email to