It's okay. It's just that lbo-provocateurs called me a "neoclassical" and a "technocrat" over there. It's frustrating that these people don't seem to know what a "neoclassical" or a "technocrat" is.
I don't know what it is, however, but for some reason I never take insults personally (except sometimes for a short time). I mostly get irritated when people don't understand what I'm saying. On 3/17/06, C Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In a message dated 3/17/2006 9:09:26 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Maybe I'm tired, but I'm little sick of being insulted on lbo-talk > today. But don't worry, I don't take it personally. The use of insults > usually means an effort to patch up weaknesses in reasoning. > -- > > > Yes,maybe on lbo, which is a nest of provocateurs for the sake of it. Here > it was just harmless banter. Sorry you took it differently. > CS -- Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence of economic insecurity." -- Chester Bowles
