Note: "  
The _hunter_-gatherer ( emphasis added -CB) economy was employed by all human 
societies up until the end of the Palaeolithic period."

Humans originate as herbivores and carnivores,i.e. omnivores. Carnivores means 
"hunters". 

Charles

^^^^^^^



Hunter-gatherer


>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



A hunter-gatherer society is in anthropological terms one whose predominant 
method of subsistence involves the direct procurement of edible plants and 
animals from the wild, using foraging and hunting, without significant recourse 
to the domestication of either. The demarcation between hunter-gatherers and 
other societies which rely on more managed techniques such as agriculturalism 
and pastoralism is not a clean one, as many societies typically utilise a range 
of strategies to obtain the foodstuffs required to sustain their community.





Historical context


The hunter-gatherer economy was employed by all human societies up until the 
end of the Palaeolithic period. The transition into the subsequent Neolithic 
period is chiefly defined by the development of nascent agricultural practices. 
The spread of agriculture originated in several different areas and periods, 
starting from approximately 12,000 years ago, and it proceeded at different 
rates. Many groups continued to practice hunter-gatherer ways of life, although 
their numbers have progressively declined as a result of pressure from growing 
agricultural communities. In many instances territories which were formerly 
unrestricted to hunter-gatherers were encroached upon by the farming 
settlements of early agrarian communities. In the resulting competition for 
land use, hunter-gatherer societies either adopted these practices or moved to 
other areas. Genocide has been another common way for colonizers to gain 
possession of hunter-gatherer territories. The few contemporary hunter-gatherer 
groups which exist today usually live in areas seen as undesirable for 
agricultural use.

[edit]


Habitat and population


Hunter-gatherer societies tend to be relatively mobile, given their reliance 
upon the ability of a given natural environment to provide sufficient resources 
in order to sustain their population, and the variable availability of these 
resources owing to local climatic and seasonal conditions. Their population 
densities tend to be lower than those of agriculturalists, since cultivated 
land is capable of sustaining population densities 60–100 times greater than 
land left uncultivated. Individual bands tend to be small in number, but these 
may gather together seasonally to temporarily form a larger group.

Hunter-gatherer settlements may be either permanently or temporarily based, or 
some combination of the two, depending in part upon the range of territory the 
community needs to cover. Shelter constructions typically use impermanent 
building materials, particularly when the community leads a nomadic existence. 
Natural rock shelters may also be used, where they are available.

[edit]


Methods of study


Archaeological evidence must be used to learn about prehistoric 
hunter-gatherers, and ethnographic studies, as well as historical information, 
provide information about living or historic hunter-gatherers. When possible, 
archaeology and ethnography have been combined, since the 1960s, under the name 
ethnoarchaeology, to provide more insight into the hunter-gatherer past. The 
new sciences of evolutionary biology and paleoethnobotany are also providing 
insights.

[edit]


Common characteristics


Hunter-gatherer societies also tend to have non-hierarchical social structures, 
but this is not always the case. Some are more nomadic or mobile usually in 
environments with fewer resources, and they generally are not able to store 
surplus food. Thus, full-time leaders, bureaucrats, or artisans are rarely 
supported by these societies. Others, such as the Haida of present-day British 
Columbia, lived in such a rich environment that they could remain sedentary, 
and other groups that live in the North American northwest coast can similarly 
remain sedentary for a majority of the year. These groups demonstrate more 
hierarchical social organization.

Common perception is that men hunt and women gather, but this is a 
generalization.

At the 1966 "Man the Hunter" conference, anthropologists Richard B. Lee and 
Irven DeVore suggested that egalitarianism was one of several central 
characteristics of nomadic hunting and gathering societies because mobility 
requires minimization of material possessions throughout a population; 
therefore, there was no surplus of resources to be accumulated by any single 
member. Other characteristics Lee and DeVore proposed were flux in territorial 
boundaries as well as in demographic composition. At the same conference, 
Marshall Sahlins presented a paper entitled, "Notes on the Original Affluent 
Society <http://www.eco-action.org/dt/affluent.html/> ," in which he challenged 
the popular view of hunter-gatherers living lives "solitary, poor, nasty, 
brutish and short," as Thomas Hobbes had put it in 1651. According to Sahlins, 
ethnographic data indicated that hunter-gatherers worked far fewer hours and 
enjoyed more leisure than typical members of industrial society, and they still 
ate well. Their "affluence" came from the idea that they are satisfied with 
very little in the material sense. This, he said, constituted a Zen economy.

One way to divide hunter-gatherer groups is by their return systems. James 
Woodburn uses the categories "immediate return" hunter-gatherers for 
egalitarian and "delayed return" for nonegalitarian. Immediate return foragers 
consume their food within a day or two after they procure it. Delayed return 
foragers store the surplus food (Kelly[1] 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer#endnote_Kelly> , 31). Karl Marx 
theorised that hunter-gatherers would have used primitive communism and 
anarcho-primitivists elaborate the mechanics further by asserting it would have 
been a gift economy, although this would not have applied for all 
hunter-gatherer societies.

[edit]


Problems with generalizing


The line between agricultural and hunter-gatherer societies is not clear cut. 
Many hunter-gatherers consciously manipulate the landscape through cutting or 
burning undesirable plants while encouraging desirable ones, some even going to 
the extent of slash-and-burn to create habitat for game animals. Some 
agriculturalists also hunt and gather (e.g. farming during the frost-free 
season and hunting during the winter). Still today many in developed countries 
will go hunting, primarily for leisure.

[edit]


Symbolic culture


Examples of the relatively few hunter-gatherer symbolic systems that have 
survived are ochre remains, Mousterian paired markings, the hand prints and 
stencils of Arnhem Land, the markings of Koonalda Cave in Australia, and cave 
painting. These appear to be more ritualistic than practical. (Many of them 
constitute rock art.) We have little idea of what the more fleeting symbols 
used in communicating across a hunting territory looked like, although the 
8,000-6,500 year old European Vinča script 
<http://www.omniglot.com/writing/vinca.htm>  may give us a tantalising glipse 
of what such marks may have looked like.

The archaeological evidence for multi-hole flutes dating from 36,000 years ago 
suggests that music and musical systems must have been known among many 
prehistoric hunter-gatherers[2] 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer#endnote_EverythingScience>  (see 
Everything Science 
<http://www.everything-science.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=82&Itemid=2&PHPSESSID=15fbfd3ae2d66117748dbd0988eeefcb>
 ). A possibly older flute has been found, but its identity is not accepted in 
some leading archaeological and academic circles -- but is accepted by others. 
See Divje Babe page for fuller discussion of the debate. It seems widely 
accepted by the public or scienctific lay community. [3] 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer#endnote_CogWeb> [4] 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer#endnote_D'Errico>  (See Is this 
bone a Neanderthal flute? <http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/FluteDebate.html> ). The 
50,000 year old Moussterian flute is in Slovenia, and is considered a national 
treasure and point of interest for visitors. In the West, various 
paleoanthropological chat lists and musicology lists continue to debate the 
matter as of 2006. Noted musicians have made models, played them publicly at 
conventions and scientific gatherings. The finder, Ivan Turk and others still 
consider it a flute, and its hole spacings are uniquely consistent with the 
spacing found on a simple do-re-mi diatonic flute. Several authors with new 
books over the past years have accepted it as the oldest known musical 
instrument.

Some conclusions may be drawn from historic and modern hunter-gatherers: body 
decoration, singing, and storytelling were likely forms of prehistoric 
hunter-gatherer cultural expression (in everyday life or the performance of 
rituals). There is some archaeological evidence for complex forms of sewing 
using pattern-cutting, as well as strong archaeological evidence for stone 
carving and etchings on bone. It is unlikely that we will ever know all of the 
aspects of prehistoric hunter-gatherer culture.

[edit]


Modern context


It has recently been claimed that, in most cases, these groups do not have a 
continuous history of hunting and gathering, and that in many cases their 
ancestors were agriculturalists who were pushed into marginal areas as a result 
of migrations and wars. These theories imply that, because the "pure 
hunter-gatherer" "disappeared" not long after colonial contact began (see 
European Colonization of Africa, European colonization of the Americas, 
European Colonization of Australia), nothing can be learned about prehistoric 
hunter-gatherers from studies of modern ones (Kelly[1], 24-29); however, 
specialists who study hunter-gatherer ecology (see Cultural ecology) vehemently 
disagree.

There are contemporary hunter-gatherer peoples whose contact with external 
societies, and whose way of life continues with very little external influence. 
One such group are the Pila Nguru or the Spinifex People of Western Australia, 
whose habitat in the Great Victoria Desert has proved unsuitable for European 
agriculture (and even pastoralism). Another are the Sentinelese of the Andaman 
Islands in the Indian Ocean, who live on North Sentinel Island and to date have 
maintained their independent existence, repelling attempts to engage with and 
contact them.

[edit]


Social movements


There are some modern social movements related to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle:

*       freeganism involves gathering of discarded food in the context of an 
urban environment 
*       gleaning involves the gathering of food that traditional farmers have 
left behind in their fields 
*       anarcho-primitivism, which strives for the abolishment of civilization 
and the return to a life in the wild 
*       paleolithic diet, which strives to achieve a diet similar to that of 
ancient hunter-gatherer groups. 

[edit]


References


1.      ↑ a Kelly, Robert L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in 
Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways, Washington: Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 
1-56-098465-1. 
2.      ↑  New Ice Age flute carved from mammoth ivory documents the world's 
first musical tradition 
<http://www.everything-science.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=82&Itemid=2&PHPSESSID=15fbfd3ae2d66117748dbd0988eeefcb>
 . URL accessed on October 11, 2005. 
3.      ↑  Is this bone a Neanderthal flute? 
<http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/FluteDebate.html> . URL accessed on October 11, 
2005. 
4.      ↑ Francesco D'Errico, Paola Villa, Ana C. Pinto Llona, Rosa Ruiz 
Idarraga (March 1998). "A Middle Palaeolithic origin of music? Using cave-bear 
bone accumulations to assess the Divje Babe I bone 'flute'". Antiquity 72: 
65-79. 
5.      ↑ Bob Fink,. Reply to d'Errico etal & Nowell/Chase's critique 
<http://www.greenwych.ca/paypiper.htm> . URL accessed on March 10, 2002. 
6.      ↑ Bob Fink,. Who made Neanderthal Flute? Humans or carnivores? 
<http://www.greenwych.ca/chewchip.htm> . URL accessed on March 1, 2003. 
7.      ↑ Bob Fink,. Odds calculated against Neanderthal flute being a chance 
product of animal bites <http://www.greenwych.ca/fl3debat.htm#What> . URL 
accessed on April 30, 1998. 
8.      ↑ Bob Fink,. Neanderthal Flute <http://www.greenwych.ca/fl-compl.htm> . 
URL accessed on April 8, 1997. 

[edit]


Further reading


*       Brody, Hugh (2001). The Other Side Of Eden: hunter-gatherers, farmers 
and the shaping of the world, North Point Press. ISBN 0-57-120502-X. 
*       Lee, Richard B. and Richard Daly, eds. (1999). The Cambridge 
Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 
0-52-160919-4. 
*       Fink, Bob, (1997). Neanderthal Flute, Greenwich Publishers. ISBN 
0-912424-12-5. 

Reply via email to