Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Plausibility does not necessarily imply proof.
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:25:42PM -0400, C Ruiz wrote:
> In a message dated 5/8/2006 9:43:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The most plausible explanation that I have read for the lack of refinery
> expansion is this: The majors expect continued "high" crude prices -- though
> not so high as now. As a result they expect slower long-term growth in demand
> for product
> Can you provide some concrete evidence of any "major" executive or CEO
> actually expressing these views and the date, please?
> CS
>
> No.
>
> Gene Coyle
>
> Well, in that case how is it "a most plausible explanation" ?
> CS
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Get amazing travel prices for air and hotel in one click on Yahoo! FareChase
