Doug Henwood wrote:
> >Would the anti-war movement in the US be interested in such
> questions?
> Probably, but it's a distraction. The US thinks itself exempt from
> international law. It's about politics, meaning mobilization and
> strength in numbers, not law or ethics.
I don't know much about the US anti-war movement. Sometimes the questions re: the law and ethics are important for mobilisation in politics. But, as I said, I don't know much about the US. So it may be a distraction.
Ulhas
In the US, possession of ignorance is nine parts of the law.
--
Sandwichman
