Yes! There are "red herrings" to be pursued!
Governors & constituents to be coerced!

Tightening the border

Newsday.com via Topix.net
BY CRAIG GORDON
May 13, 2006

http://www.topix.net/content/trb/1168806021077527548107567493522114155571?threadid=B5IHIS9D7ERC46EL

WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush is expected to use a prime-time
address Monday to announce plans to send National Guard troops to the
nation's southern border to help stem the tide of illegal immigration,
senior administration officials said Friday night.

Bush is weighing a range of options sent to him by the Pentagon that
would deploy between 3,500 and nearly 10,000 troops, said administration
officials. They said no decision on numbers had been made Friday night.

Bush's speech at 8 p.m. Monday is designed to pressure Congress to
finish work on a broad immigration overhaul that has split the two
houses, and even the Republican Party. Bush wants the law to contain
both a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants and stepped-up
enforcement, while House Republicans have emphasized only get-tough
measures.

But Bush is expected to emphasize his own tough tone on illegal
immigration to quiet conservatives who fault him for not doing more on
border enforcement. These once-reliable Bush supporters have soured on
him of late and pushed his approval ratings lower.

The National Guard plans appear to offer Bush something he badly needs -
a way to do better at sealing off the leaky border in the face of
complaints by state officials that they can't handle the problem on
their own.

In addition, National Guard forces could be deployed almost immediately,
as a temporary measure, while additional Border Patrol agents are
trained. The cost and duration of any possible deployment was unclear
Friday night.

State officials have balked at paying the cost of tougher security and
want federal dollars, a plea the White House on Friday night appeared
prepared to heed, by allocating some additional border security money
already in the budget, an administration official said.

But the plan would pose risks as well, not least of which is the specter
of the United States militarizing its border with a friendly neighbor,
Mexico. In addition, the National Guard already is facing severe strains
from repeated deployments to Iraq - a concern that arose when state
governors needed reservists to deal with Hurricane Katrina.

Currently there are about 100 National Guard troops involved in
counter-drug operations, including some along the border, guard
officials said.

In addition to the National Guard idea, Bush also is considering using
private contractors that would free up Border Patrol agents to go into
the field, additional unmanned aerial drones and even additional
fencing, though administration officials said that would not include a
massive fence some anti-immigration hawks are seeking.

Bush's emphasis on security also appears to be a recognition that some
lawmakers simply won't go along with the more comprehensive approach to
immigration unless they believe Bush is doing more to tighten up the
borders.

The White House strategy on immigration has been to wait for the House
and Senate to complete work on their own bills, then have Bush weigh in
when the two versions go to a conference committee to be reconciled.

The Senate this week forged a compromise on its bill, which in addition
to increased enforcement would create a path to citizenship for the
immigrants who have been here the longest.

The House bill contains no citizenship provision and focuses only on
enforcement. Bush is pushing for a comprehensive approach like the
Senate model, but some House Republicans are strongly resisting.
Monday's address will be the first time Bush has used the Oval Office
for a domestic policy speech - meant to convey the importance he places
on the immigration issue.

#33#

Reply via email to