Greetings Economists, Lenin's use of the 'metaphor' Infantile Disorder' is an inaccurate anti-disabled way to describe a group of people's errors. On Jun 25, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Marvin Gandall wrote:
If no one from the US security and foreign policy establishment has yet written "Right Wing Conservatism: An Infantile Disorder", somebody must surely be thinking about it.
This problem has nothing to do with any infantile disorder of any kind anywhere ever. While people get it that Bush and company malfunctioned in conservative terms by not advancing the conservative interests, what exactly is the phrase describing? Any sort of realistic investigation would end up describing the problem as anything like a cognitive disorder. Class ends up putting persons into power whose connection to the people is minimal and therefore guided by their inner lights can fantasize lie Wolfowitz that the infantry 'liberate' Iraq. The network of people involved then is disconnected despite their resources from the consequences of the decisions to act. However good it may feel to exclaim 'morons', or stupid, the point of the left is not rest upon easy un-dialectical views of the 'enemy'. The intelligence or information we gather in depth about what they do and why they fail is what matters. Joke or not to you to the disabled rights community an 'infantile disorder' is a slander of disabled people. thanks, Doyle Saylor
