On 7/23/06, Daniel Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

But
the case for strict regulation is undermined by the fact that the anti-GM
movement is dominated, like the anti-stem-cell movement, by people whose
chief problem with the stuff is that it is science.

This is a dubious assertion. Off the top of my head, who do I
associate with the anti-GM movement? People like George Monbiot,
Vandana Shiva, groups like Greenpeace, Milieudefensie here in Holland.
Such opponents aren't driven by some kind of irrational dislike for
technology. Similar to the anti-nuke crowd, they simply see it as a
technology with too many liabilities.

Aside from the potential environmental dangers or lack thereof, one
can also oppose GM foods simply on economic grounds, as an attempt to
increase corporate control of the food chain (cf, the "terminator
gene").

--
 Colin Brace
 Amsterdam

Reply via email to