Newt Gingrich: Look what you've been covering: North Korea firing missiles.
We say there'll be consequences, there are none. The North Koreans fire
seven missiles on our Fourth of July; bombs going off in Mumbai, India; a
war in Afghanistan with sanctuaries in Pakistan. As I said a minute ago,
the, the Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah alliance. A war in Iraq funded largely
from Saudi Arabia and supplied largely from Syria and Iran. The British
home secretary saying that there are 20 terrorist groups with 1200
terrorists in Britain. Seven people in Miami videotaped pledging allegiance
to al-Qaeda, and 18 people in Canada being picked up with twice the
explosives that were used in Oklahoma City, with an explicit threat to bomb
the Canadian parliament, and saying they'd like to behead the Canadian
prime minister. And finally, in New York City, reports that in three
different countries people were plotting to destroy the tunnels of New York.

I mean, we, we are in the early stages of what I would describe as the
third world war....

Tim Russert: This is World War III?

Newt Gingrich: I, I believe if you take all the countries I just listed,
that you've been covering, put them on a map, look at all the different
connectivity, you'd have to say to yourself this is, in fact, World War III.

----

Although this is probably just an exercise in hyperbole, it does tend to
concentrate one's attention on the dynamics of a third world war, if did
occur some time in the future. As was the case in WWI, events tend to
spiral out of control very rapidly. Of course, unlike WWI, a new war that
is truly global in character will very likely involve the use of nuclear
weapons and destroy civilization as we know it.

There is a tendency to downplay such dangers because the threat of
"mutually assured destruction" during the Cold War meant that using nuclear
weapons was virtually unimaginable. With the capitalist transformation of
the USSR, however, there is no longer a counter-balance to the U.S. and the
world's number one super-power surely must feel the temptation to use its
advantage against weaker adversaries.

The Pentagon began reviewing its options in 2001 and decided that the old
rules no longer applied. A white paper signed by Rumsfeld said, "nuclear
weapons could be employed against targets able to withstand nonnuclear
attack (for example, deep underground bunkers or bioweapon facilities)."
There was a genuine worry that such weapons might have been used against
the Iraqi military in the run-up to the invasion.

One wonders if the top brass in the Israeli army might be thinking along
similar lines in light of the fact that a 20 tons of explosives was not
sufficient to penetrate Hezbollah's bunkers in south Beirut and kill its
leader Hassan Nasrallah, who commented after the abortive strike: "I can
confirm, without exaggerating or using psychological warfare, that we have
not been harmed." If anything, the Hezbollah missiles might even be harder
to destroy based on the conclusions of a former Lebanese army officer cited
in a July 21 FT report. He said the longest range rockets were buried in
the south and in the eastern Bekaa valley, "so deep that bombs cannot reach
them and guarded by suicide commandos".

If Hezbollah can withstand 20 tons of explosives, perhaps they can be
destroyed with a tactical nuclear weapon rated at 100 tons. Nuclear weapons
experts define such bombs as having a range between 100 tons and one
million tons. Hiroshima was destroyed by a 120,000 ton device. But that
would be overkill. A nicely placed junior bomb of a mere 100 tons would be
more than up to the task.

The Israel nuclear program grew out of a conviction that anything was
justified to guarantee its survival, including nuclear weapons. It is of
course ironic that the term nuclear holocaust gained currency in the 1950s.
As is frequently the case with the Zionist state, threats and outright
demonstrations of inhumanity are legitimized by past injustices.

The Federation of Atomic Scientists estimates that Israel has between 100
and 200 nuclear weapons. Israel developed the bomb over 30 years ago but
never referred to it publicly until the year 2000 when Knesset member Issam
Mahoul--a member of the predominantly Arab communist party Hadash--filed a
motion to debate the nuclear issue. The motion was prompted by selections
from the first-ever publication of the transcript of the trial of Mordechai
Vanunu, imprisoned in 1986 for revealing the existence of Israel's bomb
program.

Vanunu, as opposed to the gangsters running Israel, demonstrates a
commitment to true Jewish values as these remarks to a 2005 press
conference after his release from prison demonstrate:

"I have no more secrets to tell and have not set foot in Dimona for more
than 18 years. I have been out of prison, although not free, for one year.
Despite the illegal restrictions on my speech, I have again and again
spoken out against the use of nuclear weapons anywhere and by any nation. I
have given away no sensitive secrets because I have none. I have not acted
against the interests of Israel nor do I wish to. I have been investigated
by the police again and again, and re-arrested twice, but they have found
nothing. I have done nothing but speak for peace and world safety from a
nuclear disaster... I did not seek to harm Israel, but rather to warn of an
enormous danger. I do not seek to harm Israel now. I want to work for world
peace and the abolition of nuclear weapons. I want the human race to survive."

From <http://www.vanunu.freeserve.co.uk/>http://www.vanunu.freeserve.co.uk/

In 1959, Hollywood released "On the Beach," a film about WWIII based on
Neville Shute's best-seller. It was a memorable film that detailed the last
days on earth of a group of survivors who are driven to the Arctic Circle
to escape the radiation that has engulfed the planet. All of them die. The
war began after Egypt bombed Great Britain using Russian-made planes, which
the British interpreted as a Soviet attack. It was surely plausible then,
as it is now, that the Middle East would spawn a nuclear war.

In the year 70 AD, there was a Jewish revolt against the Roman Empire led
by the "Zealots" who objected to Roman rule just as Palestinians in Gaza
and the West Bank object to Jewish rule today. Under the leadership of
Elazar ben Ya'ir, the Zealots seized control of Masada from the Roman
garrison stationed there.

In the fight to defend Masada from Roman assault, the Jews decided to kill
themselves rather than relinquish control. Today Masada is used by the
Israel Defense Forces and youth movements for swearing-in ceremonies, where
participants swear the oath that "Masada shall never fall again."


--

www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to