On 7/27/06, Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> > didn't William Morris value libido?
>
> He got the content but he didn't have the style to go with it.
you don't like Pre-Raphaelites?
Too much languor and neurasthenia. Very enervating. That's sexy,
too, but not the sort of sex appeal you need in practical politics.
> > hopefully, libido will be moderated by ego and super-ego, just as
> > libido moderates them. Hey, maybe we can attain equilibrium!
>
> No, Jim, it's disequilibrium that is sexy! Marxists, in principle,
> ought to have an advantage here over the orthodox.
hmm... I'll have to put that pearl of wisdom into practice.
Can't wait!
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>
