Doyle Saylor wrote: > > > One hundred years ago 'free love' was the socialist sort of tangent to > conventional bourgeois love.
The problem with "free love" then was that it tended to be _free_ only for men. Debatably, that is still the case. Carrol
Doyle Saylor wrote: > > > One hundred years ago 'free love' was the socialist sort of tangent to > conventional bourgeois love.
The problem with "free love" then was that it tended to be _free_ only for men. Debatably, that is still the case. Carrol