The Tel Aviv-Washington axis is indeed giving birth to a new Middle
East -- undoing its new Arab political allies (the "Lebanon First"
coalition, the Mahmoud Abbas faction) and making Hizbullah wildly
popular in Lebanon and the rest of the Middle East.  But that means
that it will redouble its efforts to put economic sanctions on Iran.
-- Yoshie

<http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/12698>
Angus Reid Global Scan : Polls & Research
Lebanese Support Resistance Against Israel
July 30, 2006

- Many adults in Lebanon believe Hezbollah is right in fighting
Israel, according to a poll by the Beirut Center for Research and
Information. 86.9 per cent of respondents support the Lebanese-backed
resistance against Israel.

On Jul. 12, Hezbollah militants based in Lebanon killed three Israeli
soldiers and captured two more in a cross-border attack. The Israeli
armed forces launched air strikes inside Lebanese territory to fight
Hezbollah, targeting the country's infrastructure and its airport.
Hezbollah has retaliated by firing rockets into several Israeli towns.
70.1 per cent of respondents agree with the capture of the two
soldiers.

The Lebanese Internal Security Forces have reported that 421 people
have been killed and 1,661 have been injured. According to the Israeli
Defence Forces (IDF), 52 Israelis—19 civilians and 33 soldiers—have
died during the conflict. In addition, 1,233 Israelis have been
wounded. 63.3 per cent of respondents think Israel will never defeat
Hezbollah.

On Jul. 28, Lebanese president Emil Lahoud expressed disappointment
with the situation, saying, "It makes you so mad inside. If it does to
me, what about these people who have got their children, their
brothers killed?" Lahoud also outlined his views on Hezbollah leader
Hassan Nasrallah, declaring, "All Lebanese respect him and I respect
him."

Polling Data

Poll highlights

Support for the Lebanese-backed resistance against Israel
86.9%

Agreement with the capture of the two Israeli soldiers
70.1%

Belief that Israel will never defeat Hezbollah
63.3%

Source: Beirut Center for Research and Information
Methodology: Interviews with 800 Lebanese citizens—Sunnis, Shiites,
Druze, and Christians—conducted from Jul. 24 to Jul. 26, 2006. No
margin of error was provided.


<http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/12710>
Angus Reid Global Scan : Polls & Research
Lebanese Chide Government's Position
July 31, 2006

- Many adults in Lebanon believe their government has not dealt
properly with the current crisis, according to a poll by the Beirut
Center for Research and Information. 58.3 per cent of respondents
think their administration's diplomatic moves are not enough to
confront the enemy.

Lebanese voters renewed the Assembly of Representatives last year. In
June 2005, Fuad Saniora—a former finance minister—was appointed as
Lebanon's new prime minister.

On Jul. 12, Hezbollah militants based in Lebanon killed three Israeli
soldiers and captured two more in a cross-border attack. The Israeli
armed forces launched air strikes inside Lebanese territory to fight
Hezbollah, targeting the country's infrastructure and its airport.
Hezbollah has retaliated by firing rockets into several Israeli towns.

The Lebanese Internal Security Forces have reported that 475 people
have been killed and 1,661 have been injured. According to the Israeli
Defence Forces (IDF), 52 Israelis—19 civilians and 33 soldiers—have
died during the conflict. In addition, 1,281 Israelis have been
wounded. 54 per cent of respondents think the Lebanese government has
not properly helped the refugees.

Last week, Siniora developed a ceasefire plan, which calls for the
release of Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails, the return of the two
Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah, and strengthening an
international force in southern Lebanon.

Polling Data

Do you think the Lebanese government's diplomatic moves are enough to
confront the enemy?

Yes
33.5%

No
58.3%

Do you think the Lebanese government's diplomatic has properly helped
the refugees?

Yes
42.8%

No
54.0%

Source: Beirut Center for Research and Information
Methodology: Interviews with 800 Lebanese citizens—Sunnis, Shiites,
Druze, and Christians—conducted from Jul. 24 to Jul. 26, 2006. No
margin of error was provided.


<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/31/AR2006073100010.html>
UN Council set to demand Iran suspend nuclear work
By Evelyn Leopold
Reuters
Monday, July 31, 2006; 12:27 AM

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council was poised on
Monday to adopt a resolution demanding Iran suspend its nuclear
activities by the end of August or face the threat of sanctions.

Barring last-minute delays, the council has scheduled a vote on the
document that demands Iran "suspend all enrichment-related and
reprocessing activities, including research and development."

If Tehran does not comply by August 31, the council would consider
adopting "appropriate measures" under Article 41 of Chapter 7 of the
U.N. Charter, which pertains to economic sanctions, says the draft.

The resolution is the first on Iran with legally binding demands and a
threat to consider sanctions. The United States and its allies suspect
Iran is developing a nuclear bomb and accuse it of hiding research
over 18 years.

On the eve of the anticipated vote, Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad told a news conference the resolution was unacceptable and
his country had the right "to take advantage of peaceful nuclear
technology."

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi also warned on Sunday the
resolution would create what he called a deeper crisis in the Middle
East, but he did not elaborate.

Germany and the council's five permanent members with veto power --
the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain -- reached broad
agreement on Friday and no major changes were made over the weekend.

But Russia and China are reluctant to impose sanctions and Moscow's
U.N. ambassador, Valery Churkin, told reporters on Friday the
sanctions provision meant the council would have "a discussion" only
on punitive measures.

Churkin also said the August 31 date was to meet Iran's request that
it be given until August 22 to respond to an offer in June from the
six nations of an energy, commercial and technological package if
Tehran suspended its nuclear work.

But U.S. Ambassador John Bolton told reporters that "if Iran fails to
comply with this mandatory obligation, we will move to sanctions in
the Security Council."

Iran's Asefi said Tehran would stop considering the incentives if the
resolution were adopted.

Asefi said Tehran could still reply to the incentive package if the
Security Council held its fire.

The resolution is drafted under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, Article
40, which says the council, before taking any action, can call on the
those concerned to "comply with such provisional measures as it deems
necessary."

Chapter 7 makes a resolution mandatory and provides options for
enforcement. The document excludes any military action.


--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>

Reply via email to