IRS Cans Elite Auditors, Undermining Estate Tax
by Megan Tady

Critics of a plan to eliminate IRS staff who audit the wealthy's tax
returns say the scheme fits in nicely with the Bush administration's
desire to kill the so-called "death tax."

http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/3482

Aug. 1 - With a cut to the estate tax looking unlikely in Congress this
year, the Bush administration is quietly planning to reduce the number
of federal agents who enforce the tax. Critics are calling the move a
"backdoor" repeal of the tax on extraordinary inheritances.

Through leaked internal agency documents, the New York Times discovered
last week that the government plans to eliminate almost half of the
Internal Revenue Service's 345 lawyers who currently audit the tax
returns of those subject to sharing a cut of their estate with the
American public upon their deaths. The Times reported the staff
reduction will be made within the next few months.

The estate tax is levied on the transfer of massive amounts of wealth to
heirs upon death. It does not apply to portions of an estate transferred
to a spouse or charitable organization.

Although some politicians and anti-estate-tax groups have launched
aggressive campaigns to repeal the tariff, the Senate has so far refused
to kill it. In June, the Senate voted 57-41 against repealing it. Last
week, House Republicans attached the measure to a minimum wage hike bill
in the hopes of winning over Democrats, but Senate Democratic leadership
vowed to kill the measure again.

While unsuccessful at repealing or cutting the estate tax through
legislation, critics say the Bush administration is effectively gutting
the tax by eliminating enforcement staff, and offering a gift to
America's elite in the process.

"For the administration to turn around and say, 'We're going to get rid
of the people tasked with enforcement of the estate tax,' certainly
looks like an effort at backdoor repeal," Lee Farris, senior organizer
of estate-tax policy at progressive United for a Fair Economy, told TNS.

The IRS did not return interview requests made by TNS, but Kevin Brown,
an IRS deputy commissioner, told the New York Times that he had ordered
the cuts because "far fewer people were obliged to pay estate taxes
under Bush's legislation."

The 2001 Bush tax cuts included gradual estate-tax exemptions for
wealthy Americans until 2010, when the tax will be temporarily repealed
for one year, before being fully reinstated in 2011.

But while only around 6,300 people leave taxable estates each year, the
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive fiscal policy
organization, and the Joint Committee on Taxation, an government
advisory committee charged with monitoring federal tax policy, estimate
that repealing the estate tax would create a $369 billion loss in
revenue between 2007 and 2016.

Farris pointed out the irony in how the IRS job cuts coincide with a
nearly $100 million increase of tax-enforcement funding included in a
newly approved Senate appropriations bill. Given the personnel cut,
critics predict the IRS will use the enforcement increases to go after
low- and middle-income taxpayers instead of investigating wealthy tax
evaders.

A 2006 study already found this trend to be true: taxpayers reporting
less than $25,000 in income were six times more likely to undergo IRS
audits in 2005 than those reporting earnings of $200,000 or more,
according to the public-interest group Transactional Records Access
Clearinghouse, affiliated with Syracuse University

At the same time, Brown of the IRS told the Times that estate-tax
lawyers are the most productive tax-law enforcement staff at the IRS,
finding an average of $2,200 of taxes owed but not paid to the
government each hour that they work.

The IRS says a significant amount of taxes are never collected from all
taxpayers. The IRS reports that the gross tax gap - the difference
between what taxpayers are obligated to pay, and what they actually pay
- surpasses $300 billion every year.

"It's just really shocking that the administration would be willing to
cut off its nose to spite its face," Farris said. "It just seems crazy
to cut the staff that are bringing in the most money at the IRS."

The enforcement division cuts directly contradict the IRS's stated
objective to go after the richest tax evaders. In a March 2005
statement, the agency wrote, "We are ramping up our audits on
high-income taxpayers and corporations, focusing more attention on
abusive shelters and launching more criminal investigations."

Farris said the determination of the Bush administration to squelch the
estate tax is testament that Bush is "willing to go to any length to
satisfy" his wealthiest supporters.


Jayson Funke

Graduate School of Geography
Clark University
950 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01610

Reply via email to