Probing a far from efficient market
By Philip Coggan
Financial Times: August 14 2006

As snappy titles go, the Paul Woolley Centre for Capital Market
Dysfunctionality hardly rolls off the tongue. But the new research
centre, which combines one of the UK's most thoughtful fund managers
with the expanding Tanaka business school unit of Imperial College,
London, will be hoping to produce some incisive comment on financial
markets.

Mr Woolley made his name at the European unit of GMO, the Boston-based
fund manager with a reputation for long-term value bets. A former
academic, Mr Woolley produced a stream of papers while at GMO covering
issues such as index-tracking and the misallocation of capital and the
poor returns achieved by those who backed corporate rights issues.

Imperial has been reaching business for about 50 years but the unit has
really taken off only after the arrival of Richard Sykes, formerly of
Glaxo Wellcome, as chairman, and a donation by a former PhD student
turned entrepreneur, Gary Tanaka. The school specialises in three areas,
risk and quantitative finance, innovation and entrepreneurship and
health care management.

The new centre, founded with the help of a £4m donation from Mr Woolley,
will look at how sub-optimal outcomes (from the point of view of the
economy, or society in general) can arise from the working of markets,
even when individuals are acting rationally.

Imperial says that a lot of academic work has been done on the
agency-principal problems that arise when shareholders delegate
management decisions to boards of directors, but much less attention has
been paid to the problems that arise when investors delegate decisions
to fund managers.

As an example, Mr Woolley cites figures showing that the typical equity
portfolio turns over its portfolio once every year. This means that a
pension fund with liabilities stretching 25 years into the future will
exchange its shares 25 times with other pension funds over the life of
its portfolio with zero collective gain but at a sizeable cost, probably
equating to around a quarter of the future value of the fund.

Another problem is that equity markets typically return around 5-6 per
cent in real terms per year. Private clients pay around 2-3 per cent to
get access to active equity management, and thus pay fees that swallow
up around a third of their return.

In turn, that raises the issue of why financial services companies
account for such a large proportion of corporate profits, when their
function is largely that of an intermediary. Mr Woolley suggests that
"there seems to be a grotesque misallocation of resources involved
here".

Academics focused for a long time on the efficient market hypothesis,
which suggests that market prices reflect all available information. But
over the last 10 years or so, a lot of attention has been paid to market
anomalies such as seasonal variations (the January effect), the
long-term outperformance of value stocks and the existence of bubbles
such as dotcom mania.

One school of thought, known as behavioural finance, has argued that
investors are not perfectly rational beings and that their psychological
biases, such as loss aversion, mean prices can depart from fair value.

But Mr Woolley thinks the departures from the theoretical world are more
profound than can be explained by the behaviouralists. He says: "It
seems there are features in the functioning of secondary capital markets
that invalidate Adam Smith's dictum that if every entrepreneur pursues
his own self interest, this will lead to the highest level of utility
for all."

The research centre will employ a small staff of academics and
administrators and will, Imperial hopes, act as a beacon for the rest of
the finance faculty. The aim will be to produce research papers, hold
conferences and a best of breed website. It will open on September 4.


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be




________________________________


*       Prev by Date: [A-List] UK state: industry and politics 
*       Next by Date: [A-List] China Tells US To 'Shut Up And Keep Quiet' On
Arms Spending 
*       Previous by thread: [A-List] UK state: industry and politics 
*       Next by thread: [A-List] China Tells US To 'Shut Up And Keep Quiet'
On Arms Spending 
*       Index(es): 

        *       Date 
        *       Thread 

*       Thread context: 

                *       [A-List] Arg mining rush, Nestor Gorojovsky Thu 17
Aug 2006, 20:21 GMT 
                *       [A-List] US Space Command To 'Secure Entire Space
Domain', tony black Thu 17 Aug 2006, 20:03 GMT 
                *       [A-List] China Tells US To 'Shut Up And Keep Quiet'
On Arms Spending, tony black Thu 17 Aug 2006, 19:48 GMT 
                *       [A-List] Financial instability: interesting
research, Michael Keaney Thu 17 Aug 2006, 13:40 GMT 
                *       [A-List] UK state: industry and politics, Michael
Keaney Thu 17 Aug 2006, 13:31 GMT 
                *       [A-List] Argentina: the next great minerals rush?,
Michael Keaney Thu 17 Aug 2006, 13:03 GMT 

                        *       Re: [A-List] Argentina: the next great
minerals rush?, Nestor Gorojovsky Thu 17 Aug 2006, 20:26 GMT 

                        *       [A-List] History and empire, then and now,
Michael Keaney Thu 17 Aug 2006, 12:57 GMT 

________________________________

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ] 
________________________________

Reply via email to