I wrote:
1) The "law of value" is Marx's term for what is usually called his
"labor theory of value." (As far as I can tell, he only used the
phrase "labor theory of value" to refer to others' ideas, e.g., those
of David Ricardo.)  I prefer the former term, because the latter is
usually read as being a labor theory of relative prices, à la Ricardo.
I think that totally misses the point of Marx's theory.

I should mention that it was pen-l's Paul Zarembka that convinced me
on this point.

There's also a thread titled "Some thoughts/questions on the LoV [i.e,
Law of Value]" on my gmail page (ready to be read and answered), which
Gil contributed to.
--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

Reply via email to