On 8/25/06, Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It fits with my impression that the value
theory in Marx's volume 1 of CAPITAL was not about explaining human
behavior theoretically as much as about an accounting framework
dealing with the _ex post_ results of human behavior.

I would hope that anyone who read the section in chpater one on the
fetishism of the commodity would concur in that impression.

--
Sandwichman

Reply via email to