In late 2004, I reviewed the film "Shattered Glass,"
(http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/culture/ShatteredGlass.htm)
which is based on the firing of Stephen Glass, a reporter for the New
Republic. The New Republic is the number one voice of the rightwing
of the Democratic Party. Andrew Sullivan, a well-known neocon, used
to be the editor. A new scandal has hit the magazine, as detailed
below. These problems are clearly related to the culture of decadence
that permeates the status quo intelligentsia. When your primary
political orientation is to justify government lies at the highest
level, no wonder a lowly reporter will conduct himself or herself
unprofessionally.

----

NY Times, September 4, 2006
New Republic Suspends an Editor for Attacks on Blog
By MARIA ASPAN

A senior editor at The New Republic was suspended and his blog was
shut down on Friday after revelations that he was involved in
anonymously attacking readers who criticized his posts.

Lee Siegel, creator of the Lee Siegel on Culture blog for tnr.com,
was suspended indefinitely from the magazine after a reader accused
him of using a "sock puppet," or Internet alias, to attack his
critics in the comments section of his blog. An editor's apology
replaced the blog on the Web site, announcing that the blog would no
longer be published and noting that The New Republic deeply regretted
"misleading" its readers.

Franklin Foer, the New Republic's editor, said in an interview that
he first became aware of the accusations against Mr. Siegel on
Thursday afternoon, after a colleague noticed a comment in the
Talkback section of Mr. Siegel's blog that accused him of using the
alias "sprezzatura" to defend his articles and assail his critics.

That comment, posted by a reader named "jhschwartz" on Aug. 27, said
that "sprezzatura appears only to weigh in on TNR forums to admonish
and taunt posters who dislike Lee Siegel" before concluding, "I would
say with 99% confidence that 'sprezzatura' is a Siegel alias."

"We launched an investigation," Mr. Foer said. He added that he was
confident that sprezzatura's posts were written with Mr. Siegel's
"full cooperation," but declined to say whether the alias was used by
Mr. Siegel himself because the affair was still under investigation.
"As soon as the facts of the case became clear to me on Friday, we
closed down the blog and made an announcement." Mr. Foer said that
while he liked to see blog posts before they were published, Mr.
Siegel did not have an editor assigned to his blog entries.

In a statement by e-mail, Mr. Siegel said, "I'm sorry about my prank,
which was certainly not designed to harm a magazine that has been my
happy intellectual home for many years."

Other bloggers noted the disclosure about Mr. Siegel. Ezra Klein, a
blogger who had tangled with him, wrote in his blog on Friday, "The
temptation to create a new persona and rally support for yourself in
comments can be almost overwhelming." But Mr. Klein said that most
bloggers "resist the urge, take the lashing and move on."

Mr. Siegel became a polarizing figure, coining the term
"blogofascism" in the midst of a debate over The New Republic's
support of Senator Joseph I. Lieberman in the Connecticut primary.

The user named sprezzatura, an Italian term for studied carelessness,
posted comments that were hyperbolic even in the blogging
environment. After readers criticized Mr. Siegel for his post about
the host of "The Daily Show," Jon Stewart, sprezzatura wrote: "Siegel
is brave, brilliant and wittier than Stewart will ever be. Take that,
you bunch of immature, abusive sheep." (A later comment deplored
other readers' "inability to withstand a difference in taste without
resorting to personal insult.")

Mr. Siegel is not the first mainstream blogger to use an Internet
alias or the first to be unmasked. In April, The Los Angeles Times
suspended the blog of a reporter, Michael A. Hiltzik, after he
admitted using aliases on his own blog and other Web sites. Mr. Foer
said that as print publications engage the Internet, it can be
difficult to clearly define and apply journalistic principles.
"Obviously, this all happened in a newer medium where the rules are
more ambiguous," he said. "But we simply don't tolerate the
misleading of our readers."

Reply via email to