The importance of religion in the broader socialist movement has always been
there.  This includes in western societies.

While I fully concur with critiques of male-domination in the Left, I'm not
sure that the desperate push for a solution by women driven by catastrophic
collapse will yield any more than it did among workers.  In both cases, you
can get a reaction to the prospect of socialism that moves to the right.

What is the basis for assuming that the role of religiously motivated women
in the US been more progressive than that of religiously motivated men?  And
the entire question of the homophobic impulse among many (not all, but
surely most) of the self-defined born-agains leaves me unable to get too
optimistic about the likelihood that it will work to our advantage.

And once you get into an organizationally imposed idea of what religion will
mean to people, you are, by definition, excluding those who don't accept
that idea, right?

Solidarity!
Mark L.

Reply via email to