*       From: raghu

________________________________

> Capitalism inherently makes it impossible for everybody to keep up with
the
> Jones.
......
>
> Otherwise, being rich isn't a social privilege.  What is being rich if it
is
> not a privilege ? How can it be a privilege if the poor are just as
> materially satisfied as the rich ?  Such is the full relativity of poverty
> and wealth.
>


Is this the full story? Forget about "relative poverty". Historically
the rise of capitalism has coincided with a massive increase in
*absolute poverty*. By absolute poverty I mean being deprived of the
basic needs of food, clothing and shelter or the means of acquiring
those. Africa never had cars and electricity, but people there were
not starving to death in the millions until after capitalism arrived.
Does Marxist theory explain this adequately?

-raghu.


^^^^^
CB: Point taken.  Capitalism has created increased absolute poverty in its
colonies.

"Relative" to the lives many people lived before the coming of the European
imperialism and colonialism they are poorer now.

^^^^^^^

Does Marxist theory explain this adequately?

CB: Marxism-Leninism explains it.

Reply via email to