http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-contractors17sep17,0,3821049.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Spy Agencies Outsourcing to Fill Key Jobs
Contractors, many of them former employees, are doing sensitive work,
such as handling agents. A review of the practice has been ordered.

By Greg Miller

[Los Angeles] Times Staff Writer

September 17, 2006

WASHINGTON — At the National Counterterrorism Center — the agency
created two years ago to prevent another attack like Sept. 11 — more
than half of the employees are not U.S. government analysts or
terrorism experts. Instead, they are outside contractors.

At CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., senior officials say it is
routine for career officers to look around the table during meetings
on secret operations and be surrounded by so-called green-badgers —
nonagency employees who carry special-colored IDs.

Some of the work being outsourced is extremely sensitive. Abraxas
Corp., a private company in McLean, Va., founded by a group of CIA
veterans, devises "covers," or false identities, for an elite group of
overseas case officers, according to current and former U.S.
intelligence officials familiar with the arrangement.

Contractors also are turning up in increasing numbers in clandestine
facilities around the world. At the CIA station in Islamabad,
Pakistan, as many as three-quarters of those on hand since the Sept.
11 attacks have been contractors. In Baghdad, site of the agency's
largest overseas presence, contractors have at times outnumbered
full-time CIA employees, according to officials who have held senior
positions in the station.

The post-9/11 period has brought sweeping changes to the U.S.
intelligence community. Spy budgets have swelled by more than $10
billion a year, and agencies have seen their roles and authorities
altered by legislation.

Largely because of the demands of the war on terrorism and the
drawn-out conflict in Iraq, U.S. spy agencies have turned to
unprecedented numbers of outside contractors to perform jobs once the
domain of government-employed analysts and secret agents.

The proliferation of contractors has outstripped the intelligence
community's ability to keep track of them.

Former intelligence officials said most U.S. spy agencies did not have
even approximate counts of the numbers of contractors they were
employing — although several officials said the number at the CIA had
nearly doubled in the last five years and now surpassed the full-time
workforce of about 17,500. Often, the contract employees had previous
ties to the agencies.

Concerned by the lack of data and direction, Director of National
Intelligence John D. Negroponte this year ordered a comprehensive
study of the use of contractors.

Ronald Sanders, a senior intelligence official in charge of the
examination, said that all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies had been
instructed to turn over records on contractors, and that one focus of
the study would be whether outsourcing highly sensitive jobs was
appropriate.

"We have to come to some conclusion about what our core intelligence
mission is and how many [full-time employees] it's going to take to
accomplish that mission," Sanders said, adding that the growth in
contracting over the last five years had been driven by necessity and
was extremely haphazard.

"I wish I could tell you it's by design," he said. "But I think it's
been by default."

Senior U.S. intelligence officials said that the reliance on
contractors was so deep that agencies couldn't function without them.

"If you took away the contractor support, they'd have to put yellow
tape around the building and close it down," said a former senior CIA
official who was responsible for overseeing contracts before leaving
the agency earlier this year.

This former official and more than a dozen other current and former
U.S. intelligence officials interviewed for this story spoke on
condition of anonymity because of the classified nature of
intelligence contracting work.

The use of outside firms has enabled spy agencies to tap a deep
reservoir of talent during a period of unprecedented demand. Many of
those hired have been retired case officers and analysts who were
eager to contribute to the response to the Sept. 11 attacks and who
have more expertise and operational experience than agency insiders.
In fact, the CIA has created its own roster of retired case officers —
known as the "cadre" — who are eligible to be hired as independent
contractors for temporary assignments.

Even so, the trend has alarmed some intelligence professionals, who
are concerned that using contractors to do spying work carries
security risks and higher costs. They point to soaring profits being
made by contracting firms, and a parade of veteran officers who have
left intelligence agencies only to return with green badges and higher
salaries.

Even those quick to praise the contributions of contractors express
discomfort with the mercenary aspect of modern intelligence work.

"There's a commercial side to it that I frankly don't like," said
James L. Pavitt, who retired in 2004 as head of the CIA's clandestine
service. "I would much prefer to see staff case officers who are in
the chain of command and making a day-in and day-out conscious
decision as civil servants in the intelligence business."

The CIA declined to comment on specific contracts but defended the use
of contractors for intelligence work.

"Contractors give the agency enormous flexibility and are an important
part of our workforce," said Paul Gimigliano, a spokesman for the CIA.
"As partners, they help us build or enhance specific capabilities we
need for a finite period."

U.S. intelligence agencies have used contractors for decades.
Corporate giants such as Lockheed Martin Corp. have long competed for
classified contracts to build spy planes and satellites. Spy services
routinely use private companies to handle support functions, such as
providing security or building classified computer networks.

In fact, two-thirds of the contractors at the counter-terrorism center
are information technology workers who manage computer systems. And
independent contractors have at times played significant roles in
overseas operations, including pilots who flew clandestine supply runs
for the CIA in Vietnam.

But current and former officials said spy agencies now depended on
contractors to a greater extent than ever envisioned to carry out
their basic spying missions.

The trend is particularly pronounced at the CIA. Whereas other
intelligence agencies can take advantage of employees detailed to them
from branches of the military, the CIA is more dependent on a civilian
workforce.

The CIA has been hiring at a record pace in recent years. But it takes
years to train new case officers, let alone to develop seasoned
operatives capable of delicate missions in global hot spots. The
agency has also turned to contractors to plug deep holes left by staff
cuts and hiring freezes in the 1990s.

Meanwhile, new intelligence entities created to fix Sept. 11-related
failures — including the intelligence director's office and centers
tracking terrorism and weapons proliferation — have created thousands
of new positions and cannibalized the ranks of the CIA and other
agencies.

One former senior CIA official said the agency had outsourced an array
of core jobs in its own counter-terrorism center, including the task
of posting names of new terrorism suspects to immigration and law
enforcement watch lists.

And despite restrictions that bar contractors from holding positions
of authority over agency personnel, current and former U.S.
intelligence officials said that contractors functioned as de facto
team leaders in numerous stations around the world, and routinely
handled clandestine meetings with CIA sources.

In Baghdad, contractors "do everything, especially 'ops' work," a
former CIA officer who has served extensively in Iraq said of the
operations functions. "They're recruiting [informants], managing the
major relationships we have with the military, handling agents in
support of frontline combat units. The guys doing that work are
contractors. They're not staff officers."

Contractors have played similarly significant roles in Afghanistan.
Gary C. Schroen, who was among the first CIA employees to enter the
country after the Sept. 11 attacks, continued to travel to Pakistan
and Afghanistan after retiring and going to work as a CIA contractor.
Among his assignments was to monitor relationships with regional
warlords as well as the head of the Afghan government's intelligence
service.

There are other restrictions on contract employees. At the CIA,
contractors cannot disburse money or handle personnel matters such as
filling out employee evaluation forms. For high-ranking officials who
leave, there are other restrictions, including a required "cool down"
period of one year during which they are barred from returning to the
agency to solicit business.

But former CIA leaders are in high demand and frequently serve as
officers in companies that have contracts with their former agencies.

John Brennan, for example, retired last year as head of the National
Counterterrorism Center and is now chief executive of the Analysis
Corp., which supplies contract analysts to the center. In an
interview, Brennan said that any contracts with the counter-terrorism
center predated his arrival at the Analysis Corp.

Contractors are subject to the same background checks and security
clearance requirements as full-time employees, officials said. But
some of that clearance work itself has been outsourced, officials
said, and even the screening done by the CIA hasn't been infallible.

In one well-known case, David A. Passaro was hired as a contractor
with the CIA's paramilitary service even though he had a record of
abusive behavior and had been fired by a Connecticut police
department. Passaro was convicted of felony assault earlier this year
in federal court in North Carolina for his role in the beating of a
detainee who died in Afghanistan in 2003.

U.S. intelligence officials said that Passaro's case was an aberration
and that security problems had not been more frequent among
contractors than among career officers.

In another high-profile case, the CIA inspector general is
investigating whether the agency's former No. 3 official, Kyle Dustin
"Dusty" Foggo, improperly accepted expensive vacations and other
rewards for awarding CIA contracts to a lifelong friend who is linked
to the bribery scandal surrounding ex-Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham.

Some officials fear that the growth in contracting is fueling a
so-called spy drain, in which talented officers are being lured to the
private sector by firms offering pay increases of 50% or more.

At the CIA, poaching became such a problem that former Director Porter
J. Goss had to warn several firms to stop recruiting employees in the
agency cafeteria, according to former officials familiar with the
matter. One recently retired case officer said he had been approached
twice while in line for coffee.

"It's like sharks in the water," said the officer, an overseas veteran
who has handled assignments in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.
"As soon as the word went around that I was leaving, my e-mail in-box
was pinging. People were calling me at home."

Sanders, the official in Negroponte's office, said it was unclear
whether the spy drain problem was real. Anecdotal evidence suggests
that some officers are leaving early, he said, but attrition rates
have not risen in recent years.

Another worry is that the reliance on contractors is eroding agency
budgets. Sanders said a recent personnel study by the Senate
Intelligence Committee found that contractors were typically paid 50%
to 100% more than staff officers to perform comparable work — a
disparity that can create internal tensions.

"It's a serious morale problem when you've got a guy in the field
making $80,000 and a contractor making $150,000," said the former case
officer who served in Iraq. "And the [staff employee] is supposed to
supervise the guy making twice the money."

The spike in the use of contractors is likely to diminish as the
bumper crop of recruits at the CIA and other agencies rises through
the ranks. However, officials said that was a process that would take
years.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

Reply via email to