Can anything be done about Brazil, India, and South Africa?

Brazil:

Lula surely deserves a challenge from the Left, but Heloisa Helena
doesn't cut it: "Mr. da Silva is so far ahead of his two main rivals
-- the centrist former São Paulo Gov. Geraldo Alckmin and the leftist
Sen. Heloisa Helena -- that the only mystery is whether Mr. da Silva
will garner more than 50% of the votes he needs on Oct. 1 to score a
knockout in the first round of voting or whether the mismatch will go
to a runoff three weeks later" (Matt Moffett, "Lula Is Set for Costly
Victory: Brazilian Leader's Election Strategy May Heighten
Polarization," 23 September 2006: A4,
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115896709022171847.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>).

India:

<blockquote>India, often touted as an emerging economic superpower and
"the next China", seems bent on emulating some of the worst aspects of
Chinese economic policy as practised before that country embarked on
sustained industrialisation.

One controversial policy allows the creation of special economic zones
(SEZs), which are duty-free and tax-free enclaves. Lubricated by
exceptionally lucrative incentives, these are meant to promote
exports. India is planning to set up as many as 300 SEZs in its
different states.

Some of these will be dedicated to specific products or services, and
some will be multi-product zones. Each of the larger zones will
colonise up to 10,000 hectares (25,000 acres) of land.

"This is liable to create one of the greatest land grabs in modern
Indian history," says Sumit Sarkar, an eminent historian and writer,
who recently retired from Delhi University. "India has never before
witnessed the transfer of hundreds of thousands of hectares of
agricultural land to private industry. Nor probably has any other
developing country."

To establish the SEZs, India's state governments are procuring
farmland in coercive ways, at prices well below the prevailing market
rates, and handing it over to promoters -- including big business
groups such as the Ambani brothers, the South Korean steel giant
POSCO, the Tatas, Mahindras, Unitech and Sahara. They stand to make
huge super-profits.  (Praful Bidwai, "Economic Zones, Path to Massive
Land Grab," 15 September 2006,
<http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=34732>)</blockquote>

See, also, Analytical Monthly Review, "Land Grab and "Development"
Fraud in India,"
<http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/amr210906.html>, which says
Left-ruled West Bengal is doing the same land grab protested by
farmers and laborers.

South Africa:

"When the African National Congress assumed power in 1994, it pledged
to right a historical wrong by redistributing 30 percent of
white-owned land to black South Africans, whom apartheid had forced
from their ancestral homelands, by 2014. To reassure white South
Africans and prevent capital flight, the ANC promised that market
prices would be paid and that redistribution would be gradual.  But a
dozen years into the 20-year plan, only 4 percent of the land has been
sold." (Ian Bremmer, "Apartheid's Gone, But Poverty Remains,"
International Herald Tribune, 31 August 2006,
<http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/08/31/opinion/edbremmer.php>).
The SACP, many unions, etc. are said to be rooting for Jacob Zuma,
but he doesn't seem all that promising.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>

Reply via email to