I notice that Michel Lowy, who was a supporter of Heloisa Helena for President in the first round (one of the signatories in the letter of support) has also in a CartaMaior (www.cartamaior.com.br) interview taken a strong position for the defeat of Alckmin in the 2nd round (here's a pure google translation-- even leaving Mr. Squid in):

Cm - Mr. he signed a manifesto of supports to the candidacy of Heloísa Helena in the first turn. How he saw the result of the presidential elections in Brazil? ML - I very find the result gotten for Heloisa important Helena. The fact of almost 7% of the voters to have voted for a candidate identified clearly with the interests of the explored ones, with a program of rupture with the neoliberalismo, with a socialist and democratic perspective, that retakes the best traditions of the PT (before its conversion to social-liberalism), is a great advance for the reconstruction of the left in Brazil. Heloísa Helena obtained to more than empolgar the hearts of six million Brazilians and that is a great step in walked for one the other future.

Cm - Mr. the government has criticized public Squid. As Mr. it evaluates it?
ML - The rocking is globally negative. Very disappointing. Nothing to see with what it had been the program, practical and the trajectory of the PT in first the 15 years of its history. Certain, one or another measure of assistance to the poor persons was fulfilled and the social movements had left of being criminalizados. But in the essential, that is, in the economic policy, continuísmo, the orientation liberal, favorable to the banks, the national and international financial capital predominated. The agrarian reform was very on this side of the promises. The government destined 10% of the agricultural mounts of money for familiar agriculture and the others 90% for the agronegócio of exportation. This sample which are its socioeconômicas priorities well. Without speaking of the scandals, of the corruption and “sanguessugas”…

Cm - Now, in as the turn, the placed options are Lula and Geraldo Alckmin. It has differences between them? ML - I find that differences exist, yes. They are two variants of the liberal politics, but exactly thus they are not equivalents. A Alckmin government would be catastrophic for the Brazilian workers. Would be government reactionary, that it will search the privatization of the little that it remains of national companies, as the Petrobras, and of the public services, and will invest in the repression to the social movements. Squid was a great disillusionment, but Alckmin is without a doubt very worse of what Squid, of the point of view of the poor persons and the oppressed ones.

Cm - Some dumb thing in the inernacional scene being Lula or Alckmin in the presidency of Brazil? ML - The government Squid never had the courage to face the United States, to breach negociaçôes of the Alca, to support the anti-imperialist processes in Latin America, as of Venezuela and Bolivia. But a Alckmin government completely would be lined up with the North American politics, as plus a pião in the imperialista game in our continent.

Cm - If it was in Brazil, Mr. it would point the vote in some of the two? It would have some daily pay-condition for this? ML - For the reasons previously displayed, and to prevent the retrocession that would be a Alckmin government, I go to vote in Squid in as the turn. As Brazilian in the exterior I have the right to vote here in the Embassy of Brazil in Paris. Without illusions, but convinced of that it is important to prevent that arrives at the power a dangerous personage, identified with Opus I gave, and the version most brutal, repressive and antipopular the wild capitalism. If it deals with my personal option, I do not say on behalf of no party or chain politics.

       michael
Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6

Currently based in Venezuela.
NOTE NEW PHONE NUMBERS
Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1
Caracas, Venezuela
(58-212) 573-6333, 571-1520, 571-3820 (or hotel cell: 0412-200-7540)
fax: (58-212) 573-7724

Reply via email to