Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> I remain a partisan of socialism, but there is one thing that makes me
> doubt the excellence of socialism: virtual absence of women leaders in
> hitherto existing socialist states and movements.

Hypothesis:

Socialist regimes result from a revolutionary movement, and the
leadership of such states consists (for the most part) in those who
achieved leadership within the revolutionary movement at an early stage.
The 'problem'* then is to be found in the conditions which generate the
leadership of embryonic socialist movements. Hence the question "Why so
few women in the leadership of socialist states" can be seen to be
_identical_ with the question, "Why so few women on lbo, pen-l, and
marxism list?

Carrol

Reply via email to