> On Oct 14, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> > Might be because, contrary to some essentialist feminist thinkers,
> > capitalism undermines patriarchy over the long term, by competing
> > away gender distinctions in favor of a purer individualism;
>
I think it might be more appropriate to say that capitalism has
created conditions which have strengthened the struggle against
patriarchy (which is, of course, not to be confused with the
selection of individual women to carry out capitalism's dirty work at
the top). So, is it that societies attempting to build socialism
haven't created such conditions? If so, why?
michael
Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela.
NOTE NEW PHONE NUMBERS
Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1
Caracas, Venezuela
(58-212) 573-6333, 571-1520, 571-3820 (or hotel cell: 0412-200-7540)
fax: (58-212) 573-7724
