http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-na-gaygop18oct18,0,7173571.story?track=mostviewed-homepage

Some Seek 'Pink Purge' in the GOP
By Johanna Neuman
L.A. Times Staff Writer

October 18, 2006

WASHINGTON — In recent years, the Republican Party aimed to broaden
its appeal with a "big-tent" strategy of reaching out to voters who
might typically lean Democratic. But now a debate is growing within
the GOP about whether the tent has become too big — by including gays
whose political views may conflict with the goals of the party's
powerful evangelical conservatives.

Some Christians, who are pivotal to the GOP's get-out-the-vote effort,
are charging that gay Republican staffers in Congress may have
thwarted their legislative agenda. There even are calls for what some
have dubbed a "pink purge" of high-ranking gay Republicans on Capitol
Hill and in the administration.

The long-simmering tension in the GOP between gays and the religious
right has erupted into open conflict at a sensitive time, just weeks
before a midterm election that may cost Republicans control of
Congress.

"The big-tent strategy could ultimately spell doom for the Republican
Party," said Tom McClusky, chief lobbyist for the Family Research
Council, a Christian advocacy group. "All a big-tent strategy seems to
be doing is attracting a bunch of clowns."

Now the GOP is facing a hard choice — risk losing the social
conservatives who are legendary for turning out the vote, or risk
alienating the moderate voters who are crucial to this election's
outcome.

"There's a huge schism on the right," said Mike Rogers, a gay-rights
activist who runs a blog to combat what he calls hypocrisy among
conservative gay politicians. "The fiscal conservatives are furious at
the religious conservatives, because they need the moderates for
economic policy. But they need the social conservatives to turn out
the vote."

A recent incident that upset social conservatives involved remarks by
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week. With First Lady Laura
Bush looking on, Rice swore in Mark R. Dybul as U.S. global AIDS
coordinator while his partner, Jason Claire, held the Bible. Claire's
mother was in the audience, and Rice referred to her as Dybul's
"mother-in-law."

"The Republican Party is taking pro-family conservatives for granted,"
said Mike Mears, executive director of the political action committee
of Concerned Women for America, which promotes biblical values. "What
Secretary Rice did just the other day is going to anger quite a few
people."

It's not just anger at Rice that worries Republicans; it's the
possible effect on evangelical voters next month.

The Dybul incident "was totally a damper to the base that we need to
turn out," said the Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional
Values Coalition, a California lobbying group that focuses on
religious and social issues.

Adding to the conservative Christians' disaffection has been a new
book asserting that the White House used President Bush's faith-based
initiative for political purposes while mocking evangelicals behind
their backs.

The tension between Republican gays and evangelicals has been
highlighted in recent weeks by the scandal involving Rep. Mark Foley
(R-Fla.), who resigned over explicit messages he sent to underage male
House pages.


--
Jim Devine / "To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only
an international crime; it is the supreme international crime
differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself
the accumulated evil of the whole." -- Nuremberg Tribunal

Reply via email to