Some...

"It also said it could not find evidence that coalition forces had
complied with a U.S. requirement to register the serial numbers of all
small arms, a key concern "given the importance of controlling these
sensitive items -- particularly given the security environment in Iraq.""

Gotta love the simplistic assumption that these weapons ever saw Iraqi soil.
Unlikely.

This is probably related to a story about a few months back about
missing weapons handled by an outfit from... Bosnia, I believe.

I wonder how many will filter back to the neo-nazi/rascist element in
the US via American paramilitary and 'contractor' types working the
former-Yugoslavian theater of operations. I hear the money's good and
the under-age girls from this bombed out region are easy.

Reuters

US can't account for some weapons for Iraqi army
Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:26 AM ET
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=newsOne&storyID=2006-10-30T062227Z_01_N29812294_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-RECONSTRUCTION-REPORT.xml&WTmodLoc=Home-C1-TopStories-newsOne-1

WASHINGTON, Oct 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. military does not have a full
accounting for hundreds of thousands of weapons purchased to arm some
325,500 Iraqi Security Forces by December 2006, a government report
released on Sunday said.

Coalition forces were not fully accountable for the 278,000 weapons that
had been purchased for the Iraqis as of August, and had apparently not
complied with a requirement to register the serial numbers of all the
weapons, the report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq
Reconstruction concluded.

The report found that about $133 million of Iraqi reconstruction funds
had been used to buy some 370,000 small arms ranging from semiautomatic
pistols to heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenade launchers.

But it said Iraqi security forces lacked spare parts -- and even
technical manuals -- to maintain the weapons.

Moreover, Iraqi forces had failed to fill open arms maintenance
positions, and the accuracy of inventories for three of the 12 types of
weapons purchased were "questionable," according to the report.

It also said it could not find evidence that coalition forces had
complied with a U.S. requirement to register the serial numbers of all
small arms, a key concern "given the importance of controlling these
sensitive items -- particularly given the security environment in Iraq."

The review was conducted at the request of Senate Armed Services
Committee Chairman John Warner. A key Republican from Virginia, Warner
recently said that the United States might have to consider a change of
course if the Iraqi government fails to restore order within two or
three months.

Another report released by the inspector general's office raised
questions about U.S. goals for transferring control of Iraqi Army
logistics to the Iraq Defense Ministry by Jan. 1, 2008.

The report said the U.S. military did not have enough personnel to train
Iraqi Army logistics units and had not developed a plan to address the
shortfall.

It also questions whether the Iraqi government would provide sufficient
funds to support the army's logistical operations for the army or its
police forces.

--30--

Reply via email to