It seems to me you can't begin to answer the question of which class rules
until you have settled on a) what defines a "class" and b) what constitutes
"rule". The problem is that these issues have troubled and divided Marxists
from the beginning and have never been resolved, though much blood has been
shed over the differences.

For example, which class ruled in the former Soviet Union (and China): the
working class? a higher form of (state) capitalist class? a new
(bureaucratic) class? the peasantry?

Does a class have to be directly and predominantly represented in government
in order to rule: Were the capitalists no longer the ruling class in the
fascist countries in the 30s? Do they still constitute the ruling class
where labour and social democratic parties originating in the organized
working class form the government?

My own view: A. Class is determined in relation to how individuals maintain
their "material conditions of existence" - pay and social benefits for
wage-and salary-earners; profits and dividends for the stock- and
bond-holding bourgeosie; and, at one time, rents and other forms of tribute
in the case of the landed aristocracy. B. It matters less whether your class
of people hold power directly than that the government advances its
interests as against that class or classes of people who rely on other
assets and forms of income to maintain their living standards. This seems to
me to be true in the broad sense, although like all generalizations, it does
not account for nuances and exceptions.

There then arises the question of whether classes "in" themselves are
classes "for" themselves. The minority classes based on landed and
industrial property have historically shown a great deal more class
consciousness and cohesion than the mass of small propertyholders and
wage-earners. But all classes have been divided vertically by income and
status, and horizontally by nation, race, religion, gender, etc. These
factors have all served to erode class consciousness, often to the point
where it class as an objective category no longer appears to exist, and
seems especially to be the case in periods like the present when when the
social system is stable and expanding.

Reply via email to