Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> How do oil companies manipulate oil prices? If they could do it,
> wouldn't they always manipulate them higher?

I think these speculations on oil-company "manipulation" for political
purposes exhibit the fatal weakness of empiricism. (Even valid
conspiracy theories tend to lean too much on entheorized empiricist
observations.) No one, of course, has ever doubted that commericial
enterprises (going back to non-capitalist commericial enterprises of the
ancient and medieval worlds) "conspire" and "manipulate" endlessly.
That's what "commerical enterprise" MEANS! And particular instances,
small and big, can often be uncovered by mere empirical investigation.

BUT when you are talking about the policies of the ruling circles,
inside and outside the government, of the strongest and most complex
empire the world has ever seen, it is nothing short of sheer lunacy to
think that one can arrive at any understanding merely by adding up the
surface "facts" of some particular occasion. No doubt C.E.O.s are not
very good dialecticians, and no doubt their 'vision' is often or almost
always terribly short-range -- but they aren't completely stupid either,
and they give _some_ attention to the context of their actions and the
complexity of the relations which determine the outcomes of those
actions. In other words, most of them are at least dimly aware that you
can never do just _one thing_. So before doing Leavisite close reading
of one vice-presidential visit or one little eddy in the huge world
market, you need first to do some careful theorizing of how oil
companies have acted over generations before you even consider looking
for any evidence that an election at this time means that much to them.
Frankly, I think it's probably a gross waste of time to give this
hypothesis any attention at all. In the last 50 years how many
price-changes of a few dollars a barrel have there been? What was the
different reasons for those many price changes? After someone does a two
hundred page study of the history of oil prices and then condenses it
convincingly into a 300 word post and then shows that he/she has a
theory of oil prices that will give credence to the present claims, then
I will at least spend maybe 10 minutes listening to them and thinking
about it.

Carrol


Carrol

Reply via email to