On 12/1/06, Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Yoshie Furuhashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are not looking for a theme here. The question is the way people
> work with one another and elaborate an enduring but ever-changing
> world view, building institutions to go with it.
ways of working together and institutions are very important stuff,
but it's also good to have the ever-changing world view has some
tendency to converge to some sort of unity.
The Marxist tradition once had a world view, a world view (more
specifically a philosophy of history) of inevitable dialectical
progress, from pre-capitalism, to capitalism, to socialism, the world
view that the Marxist tradition borrowed in part from Christianity and
in part from liberalism. It no longer does, though it remains useful
as it supplies a theoretical framework and analytical tools. A school
of thought can be built around a theoretical framework and analytical
tools, but a social movement cannot be. A social movement, especially
one with an ambition to present an alternative to capitalist
modernity, needs a world view, a world view that inspires people to
have faith in the work they must do in the face of adversity.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>
