On 1/1/07, Charles Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marxism does not utterly disdain the struggle for reforms of capitalism.<

right.

Premature anti-fascism is a preemptive reform of capitalism. In this struggle, in 2007 in 
the U.S., Marxists should use the term "fascism" liberally.<

I'm afraid that the use of the phrase "premature anti-fascism" is
dressing up a problem with too much glory. The "premature
anti-fascists" of an earlier era were CPers, Trotskyists, socialists,
etc. who went to Spain to fight France during the Civil War. They were
then persecuted, even though the US turned against fascism.

The people nowadays who yell about fascism seem to be saying we have
fascism right now, or on the road to it. Maybe, but I think the kind
of "fascism" we may be having right now is very different from that of
the 1930s (and is especially different from the German brand of
fascism). The folks who yell about fascism seem to be using the word
as a more emotive word for "authoritarianism" or "violation of civil
liberties." It's good for pumping up the adrenaline but not for
intellectual clarity.

It's a little like fuzzing up the barrier between seduction under the
influence of alcohol and rape. Both are bad, but the former is not the
same as the latter. Rape is forcible, though I shouldn't have to say
that.

The authoritarianism we've seen in recent years -- especially right
after 911 -- was forcible only toward an unpopular minority and was
generally accepted by the majority in the US. In many ways, it was
akin to Cointelpro back during the 1970s, which also applied to
unpopular minorities (e.g., the Black Panther Party). The fascism in
the Mussolini or Franco sense of the word was aimed at very popular
movements tending toward becoming the majority. The authoritarianism
of recent years in the US isn't that kind of fascism as much as it's
American as apple pie.

I don't see how liberally fuzzing up distinctions encourages reforms.
Please explain.
--
Jim Devine / "Young people who pretend to be wise to the ways of the
world are mostly just cynics. Cynicism masquerades as wisdom, but it
is the farthest thing from it, because cynics don't learn anything.
Because cynicism is a self-imposed blindness, a rejection of the world
because we are afraid it will hurt us or disappoint us." -- Stephen
Colbert.

Reply via email to