Wayne Madsden has the best answer I've seen to date:

"January 15, 2007 -- WMR previously reported that the Bush regime wanted
Saddam Hussein hanged quickly before he could testify about his
knowledge about arms deals, including weapons of mass destruction
transfers, agreed to with the Reagan-Bush I administrations. Saddam also
was likely aware of the extent of secret Bush arms transfers to Iran in
1980 that were treasonously carried out against President Jimmy Carter's
administration. It is now reported that former Russian Foreign Minister
Yevgeny Primakov has a similar opinion. He said on Russian television in
Moscow that Saddam was executed in an "unexpected" way so "he could not
have the last word" and reveal compromising information on the
relationship between the United States and his former regime. Primakov
added that if Saddam "had said everything, the current US president
would have been greatly embarrassed."

The execution of Saddam by Bush regime was an extreme form of witness
tampering. Saddam knew enough to embarrass George W. Bush, according to
former Russian Foreign Minister.

It is now apparent why Saddam was interested in passing to a Western
journalist incriminating documents on the Bush family he had his
intelligence services amass prior to the U.S. invasion. This editor
received the offer through a British interlocutor but declined for
safety reasons. However, if Saddam did manage to spirit this information
out of Iraq, it could still prove "embarrassing" to George H. W. Bush &
Sons."

Source:  http://waynemadsenreport.com/

Peter Hollings

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rui
Correia
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PEN-L] Why did Saddam become expendable?


Other US creations, offspring around the world have become embarassing
butchers - yet the US continues to cover up for them.

So, what was it about Saddam so so ticked off the Bushes????

Rui

Reply via email to