NY Times, January 17, 2007
Antiques Dealer Sues Vagrants for $1 Million
By TRYMAINE LEE

A Madison Avenue antiques dealer is suing a group of unidentified homeless
people for $1 million, saying that the group has taken up residence outside
his posh Upper East Side business, using the sidewalk in front of the shop
as a urinal, spittoon and occasional dressing room, according to court
papers and a lawyer for the businessman.

Karl Kemp, owner of Karl Kemp & Associates at 833 Madison Avenue near 69th
Street, said he had put up with the crew of vagabonds, one homeless man and
his "island" of filthy belongings in particular, for more than two years
and that he hoped the suit will force the city's hand in taking measures to
have them removed.

Mr. Kemp said the police have not made the issue a priority and that local
merchant and homeless organizations have not budged. More so, he said, the
homeless people seem content making their digs out of space uncomfortably
close for him and his customers.

The suit notes that Karl Kemp & Associates is located "within the heart of
New York's most exclusive Madison Avenue shopping district," with neighbors
like Gucci, Channel and Prada.

Mr. Kemp said it was unfair that the individuals, listed in court papers as
"John Smith," "John Doe," "Bob Doe," and "Jane Doe," spent both their days
and nights huddled with their filthy belongings at his business, while
taxpayers foot the bill for city shelter services.

"My concern is the health of the man," Mr. Kemp said by phone from his
store's East 10th Street location today. "Sometimes he's out there in
blizzard conditions, and you and I pay taxes in New York City and some of
that is to maintain decent shelters. And he should take advantage of that."

The suit contends that a large percentage of the shop's business comes from
shoppers who admire its wares from a large storefront window that has been
maligned by the presence of the homeless people and their lackluster sense
of fashion.

"They dress in what appears to be old, worn and unsanitary clothing,"
according to the suit, filed in State Supreme Court on Jan. 16.

The squatters "can often be found sleeping on the sidewalk ... consuming
alcoholic beverages from open bottles, performing various bodily functions
such as urinating and spitting ... verbally harassing or intimidating
plaintiff's patrons and prospective customers."

Shelly Nortz, an executive with Coalition for the Homeless, said that in
her 25 years working as an advocate for the homeless, she has never once
heard of an individual suing a homeless person.

"There are scores of organizations outside of the city government who lend
assistance to people living in the streets," Ms. Nortz said. "That's why I
think it's preposterous. This defies logic to me."

Ms. Nortz, who was not privy to the particulars of Mr. Kemp's suit, said
that it was likely that Mr. Kemp had grown fed up with asking the homeless
individual to leave, but that "it is a free country."

She added: "Until we see to it that every single homeless individual has a
place to stay, this is our reality."

Allan Schiller, a lawyer for Mr. Kemp, said that his client has tried
everything from contacting the police to the local merchant association but
that no one wants to take up the cause. Mr. Kemp has even asked the owner
of the building in which he leases space to remove or reroute the heating
duct outside the building to deter homeless people from seeking its warmth.
But nothing has worked, Mr. Schiller said.

While Mr. Kemp referred to one of the homeless men as a "nice guy," he said
it is time for them to part ways.

"It's nothing against him," Mr. Kemp said. "I want him to be safe and not
to be an obstruction to us."

--

www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to