CB:>>>I thought PEN-L was supposed to be to the left of Sun-Times.
That means a lot more emphasis on the shortcomings of the capitalist
system. Why would we want PEN-L to fall to the level of a capitalist
rag newspaper in its discussion of capitalism ?... <<<

me: >> isn't denouncing the shortcomings of capitalism on pen-l mostly
just a matter of preaching to the converted? sure, it's great to get
new information about capitalism's depredations, but harping on
capitalism's sins is no substitute for serious analysis. <<

CB: > I don't know. Does pen-l say capitalism has got to go ? <

me: I guess not, but it sure looks like most of the people on pen-l
are highly critical of capitalism already.

CB: >Why do the converted need anymore serious analysis ? The
converted of PEN-L have had all the serious analysis they need.  Isn't
the proposition that capitalism has such great failings that it's got
to go  the conclusion that serious analysis renders ? <

the existing analyses of the left are often poor. Getting rid of
capitalism is a goal, not an analysis of strategy, tactics, the
current situation, or the like. It might also be based on the wrong
analysis.

CB: >>>There is economic hardship in lots of America. There may not be
a "recession" as defined 40 years ago or "depression" as defined 80
years ago, but there is mass economic hardship, poverty, unemployment,
misery. Left economists should find a way to characterize this, as the
concept of "recession" doesn't seem to be able to capture it anymore.
<<<

me: >> how about "the Silent Depression" as Wallace C. Peterson's book
calls it? Alain Lipietz called it the "slow 1929," if I remember
correctly. I call it the "neoliberal phase" of capitalism's
development (starting in about 1980, though it might have started in
1973, in Chile at least).

CB:  >Sounds like the right stuff.  What's new about neo-liberalism's
"recessions" , downturns ?  They are slow ? Are they "silent" because
the new left orthdoxy is not to talk about them ? Not to talk about
poverty ? <

for Peterson, it's not a recession (business cycle downturn) that's
"silent." To Lipietz, it's not 1929 that's slow, but instead the
aftermath.

neoliberalism involves the rapid shift to free-market "solutions" of
the last 25 years or so.

I don't know of any "new left orthodoxy." Seems like a straw man.

...

--
Jim Devine / "The truth is more important than the facts." -- Frank Lloyd Wright

Reply via email to