Greetings Economists,
On Feb 22, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Sandwichman wrote:

Meanwhile the re-use and exchange of pictures relies on a coded
sequence of zeroes and ones. In other words, for you to engage the
story with a picture you have to first deprive it of precisely that
which distinguishes it from the story -- it's "aura", so to speak --
and transform it into a "story about a picture," Balzac's Sarrazine
(as analyzed by Barthes) or Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Grey.

Doyle;
The linearity of computing processing is a hurdle to surpass.  There
has been a long time problem in 'writing' applications to parallel
processing.  Your allusion has merits.

Multi-core processors are meant to speed up the processors speeds (from
giga flops to terra or peta flops per second) so that difficult
visualization projects can be done in real time.  Intel demonstrated
their prototype of such a chip by illustrating it's power to render
live motion without the usual need to put some reference dots on a
figure that moves.

I don't see that writing applications for such processing engines will
long be neglected.  Too much commercial business interest lies in such
communications devices.

I've written before this a left milieu of connection for society
processes.  The end of privacy as we know it means a society of
connection we don't know.

Doyle

Reply via email to