Jim Devine:
There is a lot of debate about the "transition from feudalism to
capitalism" but I'd say that most of the literature nowadays rejects
the idea that the shortage of gold before 1492 was driving feudalism
into the ground. It's true it did motivate people -- like Columbus --
to seek out new supplies of gold, but it also encourage kings to water
down the currency using lead and the like. And the price revolution
that followed 1492 wasn't very important to real social relations in
Europe.

I don't know about a "price revolution" but you can't have
generalized capitalist property relations without money. The enormous
inflow of silver and gold into Europe in the 16th and 17th century
was a foundation for future capitalist development. You can't develop
industry without banking and banking relied relied on silver and gold.

I will get into this in more depth later on.

Reply via email to