On 4/28/07, Yoshie Furuhashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/29/washington/29saudi.html>

For instance, in February, King Abdullah effectively torpedoed plans
by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for a high-profile peace summit
meeting between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel and the
Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, by brokering a power-sharing
agreement with Mr. Abbas's Fatah and Hamas that did not require Hamas
to recognize Israel or forswear violence. The Americans had believed,
after discussions with Prince Bandar, that the Saudis were on board
with the strategy of isolating Hamas.

When you pressure people, they say yes, even when they mean no.

How do you think GWB managed to fail instead of grow his business ventures?

The hard sell.

A bunch of BS big talk that everyone shook their heads up & down to,
and then proceeded to do it their way if possible, or bail out of the
venture. Exactly as has happened with his wars.

The thing about the hard sell is it works with 'rubes'... like
Americans who Looooove football and consider murderous wars to be a
logical extension thereof.  I'm sure that the Saudi royalty considers
most of Bush's people to be below dirt on the human evolutionary
scale... and they're right.

But the Saudis aren't the 'rubes' they were in 1910 or so when the
first barrels of oil were exported, and the geopolitical playing field
has been redrawn (quite a few times). But the US State department in
it's current incarnation is still (perhaps fortunately) reading a
playbook of domination written by the people just off the boat... the
Mayflower.

See: ""Our Indian Wars Are Not Over Yet"
Ten Ways to Interpret the War on Terror as a Frontier Conflict
By John Brown, USC Center on Public Dipomacy
<http://leighm.net/wp/2007/04/08/gwot_indiwar_jbpdbr/>

...for more on that, and some excellent comparisons.


Personal advice Yoshie... stop reading, or at least stop believing
the New York Time. It'll rot your brain, ands it's been along time
since they were REALLY a newspaper of record.

Now they're just a newspaper with highly placed connections who help
them socially engineer their readers. Trash... reporting quality of
the Daily News and not half as adventurous.

Leigh
.

Leigh

Reply via email to