Michael,

First, I sense I may have personally offended you, and/or others.  That
is not at all my intention.

But regarding Marx's statement addressing the  First International....
Marx's makes lots of statements that may or may not be consistent with
the focus of the great body of his work....for example, there's the
remark on the possibility  of a Russian exceptionalism and agricultural
commune-ism.

My view is that Marx intends, and accomplishes, a "radical"
demystification of political economy, identifying it's root, and the
source for all its branches, in the class relations of society.  Upon
that platform, Marx analyzes the conditions for the overthrow of those
relations, and consequently his work should not be regarded as a
substitute, alternative, or even "radical" political economy.

----- Original Message -----
From: "michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] dicta

Reply via email to