I wouldn't call that a "discussion" (since a discussion has a modicum of disagreement, if not more). read the article by "lenin."
On 7/9/07, Paul Zarembka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Um, Jim. You just summarily discussed "it" (Bush's conspriacy theory?). Paul Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > excellent. Too bad pen-l can't discuss it. > On 7/8/07, Louis Proyect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lenin's Tomb explains: >> >> http://leninology.blogspot.com/2007/07/ones-divine-incipience.html ************************************************************************ (Vol.23) The HIDDEN HISTORY of 9-11-2001 "a benchmark in 9/11 research" (Vol.24) TRANSITIONS in LATIN AMERICA and in POLAND and SYRIA Research in Political Economy, P.Zarembka,ed Elsevier, hardback ********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
-- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
