The Cowan/Clark position is an almost exact replay of the conservative
position in a 19th-century debate with economic liberals of the time (among
them John Stuart Mill) on the "Irish problem."

E.g., Mill wrote in his Principles (1848):

Is it not, then, a bitter satire on the mode in which opinions are formed
on the most important problems of human nature and life, to find public
instructors of the greatest pretensions, imputing the backwardness of Irish
industry, and the want of energy of the Irish people in improving their
condition, to a peculiar indolence and insouciance in the Celtic race?  Of
all vulgar modes of escaping from the consideration of the effect of social
and moral influences on the human mind, the most vulgar is that of
attributing the diversities of conduct and character to inherent natural
differences.

Vs. this take by conservative savant W.R. Greg (1869):

"Make them peasant-proprietors," says Mr. Mill.  But Mr. Mill forgets that,
till you change the character of the Irish cottier, peasant-proprietorship
would work no miracle.  He would fall behind in the instalments of his
purchase-money, and would be called upon to surrender his farm. He would
often neglect it in idleness, ignorance, jollity, and drink, get into debt,
and have to sell his property to the newest owner of a great
estate.  ....In two generations Ireland would again be England's
difficulty, come back upon her in an aggravated form.  Mr Mill never deigns
to consider that an Irishman is an Irishman, and not an average human
being--an idiomatic and idiosyncratic, not an abstract, man."


[I took these passages, by the way, from an interesting article by Nicola
Tynan, Sandra J. Peart, David M. Levy, the latter of George Mason University.]

Gil



It's all very mysterious. If genetics made India ripe for British
takeover, because American workers changed parts on their machines so
much faster than Indians or something, then why is India such a
hotbed of capitalist growth today? Did the gene pool completely turn
over in a couple of centuries, which is a microsecond in evolutionary
time?

Doug

Reply via email to