And the greater damage would be done to whom?  The US ruling class, or the 
Chinese?  Where would the impact be more likely to trigger social upheaval, the 
bugaboo of capitalists, emerging and arthritic, everywhere, called class 
struggle, Shanghai or Long Beach?
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Scanlan 
  To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:29 PM
  Subject: [PEN-L] uncle sam's banker


  Uncle Sam, Your Banker Will See You Now 

  By Paul Craig Roberts 

  08/08/07 "ICH" --- - Early this morning China let the idiots in Washington, 
and on Wall Street, know that it has them by the short hairs. Two senior 
spokesmen for the Chinese government observed that China’s considerable 
holdings of US dollars and Treasury bonds “contributes a great deal to 
maintaining the position of the dollar as a reserve currency.” 

  Should the US proceed with sanctions intended to cause the Chinese currency 
to appreciate, “the Chinese central bank will be forced to sell dollars, which 
might lead to a mass depreciation of the dollar.” 

  If Western financial markets are sufficiently intelligent to comprehend the 
message, US interest rates will rise regardless of any further action by China. 
At this point, China does not need to sell a single bond. In an instant, China 
has made it clear that US interest rates depend on China, not on the Federal 
Reserve. 

  The precarious position of the US dollar as reserve currency has been 
thoroughly ignored and denied. The delusion that the US is “the world’s sole 
superpower,” whose currency is desirable regardless of its excess supply, 
reflects American hubris, not reality. This hubris is so extreme that only 6 
weeks ago McKinsey Global Institute published a study that concluded that even 
a doubling of the US current account deficit to $1.6 trillion would pose no 
problem. 

  Strategic thinkers, if any remain who have not been purged by neocons, will 
quickly conclude that China’s power over the value of the dollar and US 
interest rates also gives China power over US foreign policy. The US was able 
to attack Afghanistan and Iraq only because China provided the largest part of 
the financing for Bush’s wars. 

  If China ceased to buy US Treasuries, Bush’s wars would end. The savings rate 
of US consumers is essentially zero, and several million are afflicted with 
mortgages that they cannot afford. With Bush’s budget in deficit and with no 
room in the US consumer’s budget for a tax increase, Bush’s wars can only be 
financed by foreigners. 

  No country on earth, except for Israel, supports the Bush regimes’ desire to 
attack Iran. It is China’s decision whether it calls in the US ambassador, and 
delivers the message that there will be no attack on Iran or further war unless 
the US is prepared to buy back $900 billion in US Treasury bonds and other 
dollar assets. 

  The US, of course, has no foreign reserves with which to make the purchase. 
The impact of such a large sale on US interest rates would wreck the US economy 
and effectively end Bush’s war-making capability. Moreover, other governments 
would likely follow the Chinese lead, as the main support for the US dollar has 
been China’s willingness to accumulate them. If the largest holder dumped the 
dollar, other countries would dump dollars, too. 

  The value and purchasing power of the US dollar would fall. When hard-pressed 
Americans went to Wal-Mart to make their purchases, the new prices would make 
them think they had wandered into Nieman Marcus. Americans would not be able to 
maintain their current living standard. 

  Simultaneously, Americans would be hit either with tax increases in order to 
close a budget deficit that foreigners will no longer finance or with large 
cuts in income security programs. The only other source of budgetary finance 
would be for the government to print money to pay its bills. In this event, 
Americans would experience inflation in addition to higher prices from dollar 
devaluation. 

  This is a grim outlook. We got in this position because our leaders are 
ignorant fools. So are our economists, many of whom are paid shills for some 
interest group. So are our corporate leaders whose greed gave China power over 
the US by offshoring the US production of goods and services to China. It was 
the corporate fat cats who turned US Gross Domestic Product into Chinese 
imports, and it was the “free trade, free market economists” who egged it on. 

  How did a people as stupid as Americans get so full of hubris? 

  Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan 
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial 
page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny 
of Good Intentions.




  Dan Scanlan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.coolhanduke.com
  EPK: http://www.sonicbids.com/DanScanlan
  http://willienelsonpri.com/arts/269/dan-scanlan-a-peaceful-solution.html


  Electing is engineering.
  Impeachment is quality control.
                       --Dan Ratherthan





Reply via email to