New York TIMES / September 25, 2007

The Space Age
>From the Start, the Space Race Was an Arms Race
By WILLIAM J. BROAD

Sputnik forced the Eisenhower administration to consider a scary new
world of space arms. It did so in two ways: talking peace and
preparing for war.

That duality held firm for much of the ensuing half century.
Washington publicly encouraged peaceful uses of space even while
spending billions to explore futuristic weaponry like death rays fired
from rocket ships.

By and large, those arms remained as fictional as those in "The War of
the Worlds." But analysts say the Bush administration is now tilting
the balance toward deploying real armaments, mainly antimissile
interceptors that would speed into space to smash enemy warheads. But
it also wants to loft jets that can shoot deadly laser beams and
orbital battle stations that can hurl swarms of lethal munitions.

Space weapons are "still definitely part of the program," said Philip
E. Coyle III, a former director of weapon testing at the Pentagon.
"But they don't emphasize it because the arms-control people come out
of the woodwork."

Critics say the overall program is costly and unnecessary, and the
funds better spent on countering such threats as terrorism.

Today, the biggest item in the nation's arms budget is building
antimissile weapons. For next year, the administration wants nearly
$11 billion, including a down payment on a $300 million effort known
as the Space Test Bed.

more at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/science/space/25mili.html?ref=science

--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) --  Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

Reply via email to