On 10/11/07, Michael Nuwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also
> > doesn't the idea of organized workplaces automatically assume the
> > factory system as the predominant organizational unit? Isn't there a
> > rather basic contradiction here? i.e. how can you decommodify labor
> > while staying within the organized workplace (which is premised on
> > division of labor ad-absurdum)?
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're getting at. All workplaces
> are organized in some why or another. You seem to have a particular kind
> of organization in mind, but I'm not clear on what that is.


Thanks for the references. What I meant was the union movement was
apparently not radical enough in its goals to fundamentally change the
factory system itself. The factory system is a particular kind of
organization originating from the early stages of the industrial
revolution.
www.unc.edu/~tgeraght/personal/Factory_OEEH.pdf

I'd imagine that the early logic for the factory was mechanization and
efficiencies from scale. Certainly it makes sense for some kinds of
production e.g. automobiles. But it seems like *all* economic activity
has come to be organized in this way.

The efficiency gains of the factory system comes at a price. There is
a lot of literature on how it reduces labor to mere appendages to
machines and the harmful effects of over-specialization. Also a
hierarchical boss-servant organization is an inevitable corollary of
the factory. So why is it that the labor movement apparently made no
attempt to critically question the logic of this institution in the
first place?

On a separate note: does the efficiency logic of a centralized
workplace still apply today? Is such an organization really essential
for a modern economy - which is dominated by services anyway? Why is
there so little telecommuting even today for such professions as
computer programming and accounting? (I'd argue that the free software
projects are proof that alternative types of organization for
production are feasible at least for computer programming.)
-raghu.

Reply via email to