The "Good Germans" Among Us

By Frank Rich
The New York Times /  Sunday 14 October 2007

"Bush lies" doesn't cut it anymore. It's time to confront the darker
reality that we are lying to ourselves.

Ten days ago The Times unearthed yet another round of secret
Department of Justice memos countenancing torture. President Bush gave
his standard response: "This government does not torture people." Of
course, it all depends on what the meaning of "torture" is. The whole
point of these memos is to repeatedly recalibrate the definition so
Mr. Bush can keep pleading innocent.

By any legal standards except those rubber-stamped by Alberto
Gonzales, we are practicing torture, and we have known we are doing so
ever since photographic proof emerged from Abu Ghraib more than three
years ago. As Andrew Sullivan, once a Bush cheerleader, observed last
weekend in The Sunday Times of London, America's "enhanced
interrogation" techniques have a grotesque provenance: "Verschärfte
Vernehmung, enhanced or intensified interrogation, was the exact term
innovated by the Gestapo to describe what became known as the 'third
degree.' It left no marks. It included hypothermia, stress positions
and long-time sleep deprivation."

Still, the drill remains the same. The administration gives its alibi
(Abu Ghraib was just a few bad apples). A few members of Congress
squawk. The debate is labeled "politics." We turn the page.

There has been scarcely more response to the similarly recurrent story
of apparent war crimes committed by our contractors in Iraq. Call me
cynical, but when Laura Bush spoke up last week about the human rights
atrocities in Burma, it seemed less an act of selfless humanitarianism
than another administration maneuver to change the subject from its
own abuses.

As Mrs. Bush spoke, two women, both Armenian Christians, were gunned
down in Baghdad by contractors underwritten by American taxpayers. On
this matter, the White House has been silent. That incident followed
the Sept. 16 massacre in Baghdad's Nisour Square, where 17 Iraqis were
killed by security forces from Blackwater USA, which had already been
implicated in nearly 200 other shooting incidents since 2005. There
has been no accountability. The State Department, Blackwater's sugar
daddy for most of its billion dollars in contracts, won't even share
its investigative findings with the United States military and the
Iraqi government, both of which have deemed the killings criminal.

The gunmen who mowed down the two Christian women worked for a
Dubai-based company managed by Australians, registered in Singapore
and enlisted as a subcontractor by an American contractor
headquartered in North Carolina. This is a plot out of "Syriana" by
way of "Chinatown." There will be no trial. We will never find out
what happened. A new bill passed by the House to regulate contractor
behavior will have little effect, even if it becomes law in its
current form.

We can continue to blame the Bush administration for the horrors of
Iraq — and should. Paul Bremer, our post-invasion viceroy and the
recipient of a Presidential Medal of Freedom for his efforts, issued
the order that allows contractors to elude Iraqi law, a folly second
only to his disbanding of the Iraqi Army. But we must also examine our
own responsibility for the hideous acts committed in our name in a war
where we have now fought longer than we did in the one that put
Verschärfte Vernehmung on the map.

I have always maintained that the American public was the least
culpable of the players during the run-up to Iraq. The war was sold by
a brilliant and fear-fueled White House propaganda campaign designed
to stampede a nation still shellshocked by 9/11. Both Congress and the
press — the powerful institutions that should have provided the
checks, balances and due diligence of the administration's case —
failed to do their job. Had they done so, more Americans might have
raised more objections. This perfect storm of democratic failure began
at the top.

As the war has dragged on, it is hard to give Americans en masse a
pass. We are too slow to notice, let alone protest, the calamities
that have followed the original sin.

In April 2004, Stars and Stripes first reported that our troops were
using makeshift vehicle armor fashioned out of sandbags, yet when a
soldier complained to Donald Rumsfeld at a town meeting in Kuwait
eight months later, he was successfully pilloried by the right. Proper
armor procurement lagged for months more to come. Not until early this
year, four years after the war's first casualties, did a Washington
Post investigation finally focus the country's attention on the shoddy
treatment of veterans, many of them victims of inadequate armor, at
Walter Reed Army Medical Center and other military hospitals.

We first learned of the use of contractors as mercenaries when four
Blackwater employees were strung up in Falluja in March 2004, just
weeks before the first torture photos emerged from Abu Ghraib. We
asked few questions. When reports surfaced early this summer that our
contractors in Iraq (180,000, of whom some 48,000 are believed to be
security personnel) now outnumber our postsurge troop strength, we
yawned. Contractor casualties and contractor-inflicted casualties are
kept off the books.

It was always the White House's plan to coax us into a blissful
ignorance about the war. Part of this was achieved with the usual
Bush-Cheney secretiveness, from the torture memos to the prohibition
of photos of military coffins. But the administration also invited our
passive complicity by requiring no shared sacrifice. A country that
knows there's no such thing as a free lunch was all too easily
persuaded there could be a free war.

Instead of taxing us for Iraq, the White House bought us off with tax
cuts. Instead of mobilizing the needed troops, it kept a draft off the
table by quietly purchasing its auxiliary army of contractors to
finesse the overstretched military's holes. With the war's entire
weight falling on a small voluntary force, amounting to less than 1
percent of the population, the rest of us were free to look the other
way at whatever went down in Iraq.

We ignored the contractor scandal to our own peril. Ever since Falluja
this auxiliary army has been a leading indicator of every element of
the war's failure: not only our inadequate troop strength but also our
alienation of Iraqi hearts and minds and our rampant outsourcing to
contractors rife with Bush-Cheney cronies and campaign contributors.
Contractors remain a bellwether of the war's progress today. When
Blackwater was briefly suspended after the Nisour Square catastrophe,
American diplomats were flatly forbidden from leaving the fortified
Green Zone. So much for the surge's great "success" in bringing
security to Baghdad.

Last week Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq war combat veteran who directs Iraq
and Afghanistan Veterans of America, sketched for me the apocalypse to
come. Should Baghdad implode, our contractors, not having to answer to
the military chain of command, can simply "drop their guns and go
home." Vulnerable American troops could be deserted by those "who
deliver their bullets and beans."

This potential scenario is just one example of why it's in our
national self-interest to attend to Iraq policy the White House counts
on us to ignore. Our national character is on the line too. The
extralegal contractors are both a slap at the sovereignty of the
self-governing Iraq we supposedly support and an insult to those in
uniform receiving as little as one-sixth the pay. Yet it took mass
death in Nisour Square to fix even our fleeting attention on this
long- metastasizing cancer in our battle plan.

Similarly, it took until December 2005, two and a half years after
"Mission Accomplished," for Mr. Bush to feel sufficient public
pressure to acknowledge the large number of Iraqi casualties in the
war. Even now, despite his repeated declaration that "America will not
abandon the Iraqi people," he has yet to address or intervene
decisively in the tragedy of four million-plus Iraqi refugees, a
disproportionate number of them children. He feels no pressure from
the American public to do so, but hey, he pays lip service to Darfur.

Our moral trajectory over the Bush years could not be better
dramatized than it was by a reunion of an elite group of two dozen
World War II veterans in Washington this month. They were participants
in a top-secret operation to interrogate some 4,000 Nazi prisoners of
war. Until now, they have kept silent, but America's recent record
prompted them to talk to The Washington Post.

"We got more information out of a German general with a game of chess
or Ping-Pong than they do today, with their torture," said Henry Kolm,
90, an M.I.T. physicist whose interrogation of Rudolf Hess, Hitler's
deputy, took place over a chessboard. George Frenkel, 87, recalled
that he "never laid hands on anyone" in his many interrogations,
adding, "I'm proud to say I never compromised my humanity."

Our humanity has been compromised by those who use Gestapo tactics in
our war. The longer we stand idly by while they do so, the more we
resemble those "good Germans" who professed ignorance of their own
Gestapo. It's up to us to wake up our somnambulant Congress to
challenge administration policy every day. Let the war's last
supporters filibuster all night if they want to. There is nothing left
to lose except whatever remains of our country's good name.
-- 
Jim Devine /  "The trick for radicals has been and will be to make of
earth a heaven, but without blind faith." -- Mike Yates.

Reply via email to